this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2025
470 points (85.1% liked)

Memes

56087 readers
538 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] davel@lemmy.ml 15 points 6 months ago (1 children)

If Trotsky’s ideas had been implemented, the USSR would have been ethnically cleansed by the Nazis, and the rest of Europe would have fallen to them, save Italy & Spain which were already fascist.

[–] DylanMc6@lemmy.ml -4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

what about bukharin? if he takes over instead of stalin and his ideas were implemented, what would the ussr be like? the ussr be better off?

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 9 points 6 months ago (1 children)

No. Bukharin was both a Mechanist and a right-opportunist that rejected collectivization, and ultimately stood against the USSR.

I think it's better for you to confront the ghost of Stalin than focus on what the USSR may have been had someone else been elected.

[–] DylanMc6@lemmy.ml -1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

maybe Grigory Zinoviev, perhaps?

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)
[–] DylanMc6@lemmy.ml -1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

i'm just asking what would the ussr would be like if someone other than stalin (or trotsky) led the country after lenin (like zinoviev)

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 8 points 6 months ago

I think a better basis is instead looking at why the soviets did what they did in the first place before asking what might have been different otherwise.