this post was submitted on 22 Dec 2025
470 points (85.1% liked)

Memes

56087 readers
538 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DylanMc6@lemmy.ml -4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

what about bukharin? if he takes over instead of stalin and his ideas were implemented, what would the ussr be like? the ussr be better off?

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 9 points 6 months ago (1 children)

No. Bukharin was both a Mechanist and a right-opportunist that rejected collectivization, and ultimately stood against the USSR.

I think it's better for you to confront the ghost of Stalin than focus on what the USSR may have been had someone else been elected.

[–] DylanMc6@lemmy.ml -1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

maybe Grigory Zinoviev, perhaps?

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 8 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)
[–] DylanMc6@lemmy.ml -1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

i'm just asking what would the ussr would be like if someone other than stalin (or trotsky) led the country after lenin (like zinoviev)

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 8 points 6 months ago

I think a better basis is instead looking at why the soviets did what they did in the first place before asking what might have been different otherwise.