this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2026
117 points (98.3% liked)

Europe

8419 readers
961 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Financial Times, 2 January 2026

Europe is so far behind the US in digital infrastructure it has “lost the internet”, a top European cyber enforcer has warned.

Miguel De Bruycker, director of the Centre for Cybersecurity Belgium (CCB), told the Financial Times that it was “currently impossible” to store data fully in Europe because US companies dominate digital infrastructure.

“We’ve lost the whole cloud. We have lost the internet, let’s be honest,” De Bruycker said. “If I want my information 100 per cent in the EU . . . keep on dreaming,” he added. “You’re setting an objective that is not realistic.”

The Belgian official warned that Europe’s cyber defences depended on the co-operation of private companies, most of which are American. “In cyber space, everything is commercial. Everything is privately owned,” he said.

This dependence was not an “enormous security problem” for the EU, said De Bruycker, who has led the CCB since it was founded a decade ago. But Europe was missing out on crucial new technologies, which are being spearheaded in the US and elsewhere, he said. These include cloud computing and artificial intelligence — both vital for defending European countries against cyber attacks.

Europe needed to build its own capabilities to strengthen innovation and security, said De Bruycker, adding that legislation such as the EU’s AI Act, which regulates the development of the fast-developing technology, was “blocking” innovation.

He suggested that EU governments should support private initiatives to build scale in areas such as cloud computing or digital identification technologies.

It could be similar to when European countries jointly set up the planemaker Airbus, he said: “Everybody was supporting the Airbus initiatives decades ago. We need the same initiative on [an] EU level in the cyber domain.”

Companies such as OVHcloud in France and Germany’s Schwarz Digital already provide crucial digital infrastructure, according to IT experts.

EU countries have been fretting about their dependency on US tech companies such as Amazon, with calls growing to increase Europe’s “technological sovereignty”.

De Bruycker said those discussions were often “religious” and lacked focus, however. “I think on an EU level we should clearly identify what sovereignty means to us in the digital domain,” he said. “Instead of putting that focus on how can we stop the US ‘hyperscalers’, maybe we put our energy in . . . building up something by ourselves.”

Belgium, as a host of the EU institutions and Nato, has been in the crosshairs of increased hybrid attacks allegedly staged by Russia, with increased cyber assaults and drone incursions into its airspace since Moscow’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022.

Last year Belgium suffered five waves of DDoS attacks lasting days, in which compromised devices overwhelm websites of businesses and government agencies to temporarily take them down. De Bruycker said the attacks typically targeted up to 20 different organisations per day, with “Russian hacktivists” generally behind them.

Although it was unclear whether the Kremlin was directly sponsoring them, the attacks generally followed as a response to anti-Russian statements by politicians.

“Sometimes . . . it’s not even a Belgian official, it’s an EU official who has said something in Brussels, and they start to attack,” he said.

Although such attacks have increased, De Bruycker does not see them as particularly harmful and says they are mostly aimed at disruption. “It’s temporary, it’s not stealing any information. It’s really disturbing the normal functioning of the website or the portal.”

After Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine, the US hyperscalers were crucial in helping salvage data from Russian attacks, he said.

He also expressed confidence in continued co-operation with American companies to crack down on bad actors, despite US tech companies having aligned themselves closely with the Trump administration, which has repeatedly signalled it would step away from supporting Europe’s security.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] plyth@feddit.org 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The client can't just fetch them from both but has to publish them on both.

Reddit offers a paid API so it should already be possible.

The price is an issue but I doubt that a competitor can be established like that. It would essentially be another Reddit client.

[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

You don't need an API. The law says that you need permission.

Another technological possibility is to scrape a subreddit to migrate the discussions to EG Lemmy. That might actually be legal in the US but certainly not in Europe.

[–] plyth@feddit.org 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There are other Reddit clients so the permission exists.

[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] plyth@feddit.org 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I did. They copied Facebook without permissions. The alternative Reddit clients have them so it is not the same.

[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That's not quite what the judgment was about. Anyway, I don't understand what point you are trying to make.

[–] plyth@feddit.org 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There are legal clients for Reddit from third parties. Building another client cannot be prevented from Reddit.

Adding comments from other social networks would be the only difference that is needed for the initially suggested mixing of social networks. I don't think that Reddit has the right to prevent that.

So a new network that also shows Reddit comments is possible.

[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There are legal clients for Reddit from third parties. Building another client cannot be prevented from Reddit.

If you need Reddit's permission to connect to Reddit, then Reddit can grant or deny permission under the condition that you only use approved clients.

Adding comments from other social networks would be the only difference that is needed for the initially suggested mixing of social networks. I don’t think that Reddit has the right to prevent that.

It very much has that right in the EU. First, there's copyright. The US has Fair Use, the EU doesn't. The EU has a database right, a kind of intellectual property which does not exist in the US. There's also contract law, ie what it says in the TOS. In the US, you can't use contract law to override Fair Use. Then there's the GDPR, which is always a tough call. It might be legal enough for most purposes.

[–] plyth@feddit.org 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The Reddit migration to Lemmy happened because they introduced a paid API for clients. How could Reddit prevent another paying client?

[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Not sure I'm following this. Why would Reddit not want paying clients?

[–] plyth@feddit.org 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Because a client could establish their own social network, bootstrapped with Reddit comments.

[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Makes sense. But then, why make the deal?

[–] plyth@feddit.org 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Are they allowed to deny customers?

[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Of course. Like you and me, they are more or less free to do as they please.

[–] plyth@feddit.org 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Then it first needs to be established that they have a monopoly.

[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

In principle, the law makes it possible to coerce a monopolist to contract. Alternatively, contract clauses which create or abuse a monopoly may be void.

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Scraping doesn’t solve the network effect issue. Having a ghost town where all the ghosts are mimicking a real town doesn’t give you a real town. You actually need people to come over and join the community.

[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

True. It only makes migration easier, but that's still something.

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Does it make migration easier? I don’t think it does. I think it makes migration harder.

If I switch to Lemmy and join my favourite migrated community (all posts and comments scraped and reposted from my favourite subreddit) and then I try to reply to those messages on Lemmy, nobody is there to reply to me! It’s a ghost town where I’m the only one who’s not a ghost! That sucks, so I leave.

[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I was thinking about a scenario where the moderators, or some part of the community, decide to migrate. I should have clarified that.

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Getting a large enough part of the community to agree to migrate is the hard part. That’s what network effects mean. If you’re assuming that in your scenario then you’re not addressing the core problem.