this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2026
51 points (98.1% liked)
Selfhosted
60210 readers
970 users here now
A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.
Rules:
-
Be civil.
-
No spam.
-
Posts are to be related to self-hosting.
-
Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.
-
Submission headline should match the article title.
-
No trolling.
-
Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details.
Resources:
- selfh.st Newsletter and index of selfhosted software and apps
- awesome-selfhosted software
- awesome-sysadmin resources
- Self-Hosted Podcast from Jupiter Broadcasting
Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.
Questions? DM the mods!
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
RAID (except RAID0) is data redundancy, it just isn't backup (ie. it doesn't help if you accidentally delete stuff, or if some bug corrupts it, or if you drop the computer while moving it).
Fine.
Pull 1 drive and see how redundant your data is while it's resilvering.
RAID is NOT data redundancy. You still have a single copy of your data.
Tell me again how RAID is data redundancy?
https://www2.eecs.berkeley.edu/Pubs/TechRpts/1987/CSD-87-391.html
RAID0 has no redundancy, but all of the other RAID options do have redundancy.
By that reasoning, backup isn't redundancy because you'll lose your data if the backup gets corrupted while restoring.
That said, there's nothing wrong in redefining "redundant" to mean "having two or more duplicates"... you should however tell people if you do, to avoid misleading people that assume the dictionary definition.