this post was submitted on 03 Jan 2026
15 points (63.2% liked)
Progressive Politics
3637 readers
545 users here now
Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)
(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
And I think that's what's being criticized. The USSR had a stated goal of expanding communism worldwide, so I guess it made sense that they were quick to aid potential socialist allies like Cuba.
China, on the other hand, doesn't seem to have that same level of comradeship with other socialist and budding socialist nations, and are more focused internally.
OP seems to be taking issue with that. I guess it's their belief that they should be helping the working class worldwide.
In the case of Cuba, I was actually surprised how reluctant they were to send aid in Blowback Season 2, due to US aggression. But anyway
Yeah, China doesn't and I think it's certainly a valid criticism. If I'm giving them the benefit of the doubt, I'd say China is focused solely on improving material conditions through trade. It seems like they're waiting for the US to collapse and for BRICS to overtake the G7 before they play an active role, if they ever do.
I kind of think pan-africanism and an American uprising will be more central to global revolution, with China as a model. But that's just a hunch of mine after reading Fanon