this post was submitted on 05 Jan 2026
1003 points (99.1% liked)

World News

51843 readers
2996 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi said Beijing cannot accept any country acting as the "world's judge" after the United States captured Venezuela's President Nicolas Maduro.

The world's second-largest economy has provided Venezuela with an economic lifeline since the U.S. and its allies ramped up sanctions in 2017, purchasing roughly $1.6 billion worth of goods in 2024, the most recent full-year data available.

Almost half of China's purchases were crude oil, customs data shows, while its state-owned oil giants had invested around $4.6 billion in Venezuela by 2018, according to data from the American Enterprise Institute think tank, which tracks Chinese overseas corporate investment.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] reddit_sux@lemmy.world 20 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Sanctions against US like the ones against Russia.

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online -5 points 6 days ago (2 children)
[–] reddit_sux@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago (2 children)

In spite of many of its economic and military misadventures, China hasn't invaded anyone as of yet.

That distinction is still important or else v shud sanction every country.

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 14 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

China is occupying Tibet and Hong Kong and claiming it owns Taiwan as well. It also frequently sends warships through seas owned by the Philippines where it has been illegally fishing and destroying Philippines fishing vessels. A couple of weeks ago Chinese authorities refused an Indian passport because they claimed that part of India belonged to China.

Also, China waged war on it's own people in Tienanmen Square.

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 12 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Hong Kong was returned to china by the UK as agreed when it was leased. None (few?) of the people living there at the time of handowver were alive when the agreement was made but they were living in Hong Kong on borrowed tine regardless, legally speaking. It's a very different situation to an illegal invasion.

China not getting Hong Kong back as a territory would have been more damaging to international law and order and international treaties and agreements. International treaties and agreements are supposed to outlive those who agreed them. It's between nations, not people.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, much as I dislike how it turned out and how China has been ignoring what post-unification rules there were on Hong Kong, the return itself was above board. Had I been living in Hong Kong in the years leading up I'd have taken the opportunity to get out if at all possible.

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online -4 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Idk about above board, the nation it was supposed to be returned to doesn't exist anymore.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Successor_state

Example:

USSR --> Succeeded by Russian Federation and they inherited the UN seat and the Non Proliferation Treaty

ROC --> UN members voted to recognize PRC as the representative of "China"

Returning Hong Kong to China wasn't the issue, the issue is that PRC does not have democracy. If they had democracy, I doubt anyone would care that Hong Kong became part of China.

I don't think Hong Kongers want to secede, per se, they just want freedom.

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 3 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

If they had democracy, I doubt anyone would care that Hong Kong became part of China.

I certainly wouldn't. If anything I'd probably celebrate it.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

It's a not uncommon pattern to have "successor states" that inherit the treaties and obligations of the previous ones. For example how Russia "inherited" the Soviet Union's position on the UN Security Council, or how Canada is bound by treaties with the First Nations that were signed by Britain (who we were a colony of at the time).

Would have been a Big Funny if Britain had handed Hong Kong off to Taiwan instead, though.

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 3 points 5 days ago

Yeah that would have been awesome.

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 4 points 5 days ago

According to the BBC:

What was agreed for the future of Hong Kong?

China agreed to govern Hong Kong under the principle of "one country, two systems", where the city would enjoy "a high degree of autonomy, except in foreign and defence affairs" for the next 50 years.

Hong Kong became a Special Administrative Region, and would retain certain freedoms, including:

  • an independent judiciary
  • multiple political parties
  • freedom of assembly and speech

The territory has its own mini-constitution - the Basic Law - that enshrines these rights.

It states that "the ultimate aim" is to elect the territory's leader, the chief executive, "by universal suffrage" and "in accordance with democratic procedures".

What actually happened is the Chinese Government immediately went in with their military, restructured the legislative body, and cracked down hard on any dissent.

YhSnGH0y2htDaGv.jpg

ndlYaC0peLOPHu0.jpg

mE3tMRa2BU251z8.jpg

sUX5yEbGHwmRjKm.jpg

KU2aGlbFVfuieOE.jpg

4jNLHhTWSb6JkC9.jpg

[–] Dudewitbow@lemmy.zip 6 points 6 days ago

well not invaded anyone of recent. the last official one would be the short one in vietnam after vietnam ended the Khmer Rouge. this of course was nearly half a century ago though, so a lot of poeple online wouldn't recall it because it wouldn't be part of their generation.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

China is already sanctionned. There is no sanctions on the United Snakes

[–] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online -5 points 6 days ago

Welcome to the discussion. Glad you're all caught up. Be sure to check for updates after more than 2 days have passed, likely 2 to 3 weeks.