this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2026
485 points (99.6% liked)

World News

51868 readers
2238 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Donald Trump has asked for at least $100bn (£75bn) in oil industry spending for Venezuela, but received a lukewarm response at the White House as one executive warned the South American country was currently "uninvestable".

Bosses of the biggest US oil firms who attended the meeting acknowledged that Venezuela, sitting on vast energy reserves, represented an enticing opportunity.

But they said significant changes would be needed to make the region an attractive investment. No major financial commitments were immediately forthcoming.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Judging from the anger over ICE and anti-american administration if Trump tries to stop the election there will be riots and strikes.

[–] Jhex@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I lost count of the many "if x happens we'll act" excuses…

[–] Aussiemandeus@aussie.zone 12 points 16 hours ago

Yeah America is a laughing stock around my local pub table.

[–] Typhoon@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I have yet to see any evidence that Trump doing anything would cause riots and strikes. The American people are too pacified to defend themselves.

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago

We've already had a few riots.

Technically we've also had Jan 6th, but I know that's not what you mean.

[–] curbstickle@anarchist.nexus 12 points 1 day ago

Unfortunately that doesnt change what @drdalek@lemmy.dbzer0.com is concerned about, specifically when we take the executive order that marks nonexistent organizations and basic political beliefs as "terrorist organizations".

Which can be applied to both groups. So it comes down to the response to that - and we know how ICE is being used and how they are trying to use the NG.

My fear is that this is going to get extremely bloody. Elections won't matter at that point, even if they were held.