this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2026
500 points (99.0% liked)

Technology

78543 readers
3160 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from : https://lemmy.zip/post/56719476

Italy fined Cloudflare 14.2 million euros for refusing to block access to pirate sites on its 1.1.1.1 DNS service, the country’s communications regulatory agency, AGCOM, announced yesterday. Cloudflare said it will fight the penalty and threatened to remove all of its servers from Italian cities.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] nialv7@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

I haven't been talking about this specific case about Cloudflare, at all. To set the record straight, I am unequivocally against the Italy government trying to ban pirate sites, that's absolutely wrong.

What I am arguing against is the absolutist sentiment that "censorship is always wrong, in whatever circumstances, no matter what it is used to do". Granted, I could have been more tactful talking about this under a post where the government is using censorship to do a terrible thing. But my position is still my position.

Like, we want gun control, don't we? Because gun kills people. Speech can kill people too! Many, many people has died because of the current rise of vaccine hesitancy. If you want to regulate guns to reduce harm, why won't you want to regulate speech too?

[–] deliriousdreams@fedia.io 1 points 24 minutes ago

I need some time to think about what you wrote before I respond. I need to switch gears here and also give some thought to how such a thing would play out.