this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2026
489 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

78543 readers
3128 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from : https://lemmy.zip/post/56719476

Italy fined Cloudflare 14.2 million euros for refusing to block access to pirate sites on its 1.1.1.1 DNS service, the country’s communications regulatory agency, AGCOM, announced yesterday. Cloudflare said it will fight the penalty and threatened to remove all of its servers from Italian cities.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] billwashere@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

Blocking cloudflare is about as useful as a screen door on a submarine. Unless they start blocking IPs like the great firewall of china blocking any DNS is kinda pointless. Unless maybe if the domain’s primary name servers are cloudflare but I can’t seeing any site doing nefarious things using cloudflare. Run your own DNS resolver on a VPS somewhere besides Italy.

My worry is the internet starts getting terribly segmented and not interconnected. That would be more of an issue.

[–] webkitten@piefed.social 14 points 9 hours ago

Don't praise Cloudflare or Italy; both are part of the problem.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 18 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Corps are getting bigger than countries and starting to flex. Scary shit.

[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago

Jennifer Government and Snow Crash here we come. Except we don’t get any of the cool shit fictional cyber-dystopias do.

[–] admant@lemmy.zip 59 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I mention it to my friends and family every chance I get. I try to explain that the digital walls they're building aren't going to keep us safe but I'm always met with tired indifference.

[–] SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org 1 points 3 hours ago

...until they can't access some site or service. Then it's panic.

[–] AI_toothbrush@lemmy.zip 1 points 7 hours ago

Yeah the worst fucking part is that theyre indifferent. They dont promote these measures, they just dont care. If they did, a discussion could be had at least.

[–] reksas@sopuli.xyz 14 points 1 day ago

about as safe as when in prison

[–] SW42@lemmy.world 182 points 1 day ago (29 children)
load more comments (29 replies)
[–] db2@lemmy.world 59 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Are they becoming less shitty or is this accidentally doing the right thing?

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 59 points 1 day ago (4 children)

They did as sort of positive thing while praising Elon and Vance, despite both their visions of “free speech” as being “free speech for what I like and not you”

So a hearty fuck Cloudflare, fuck American tech for one again operating in a country and refusing to follow their laws, and fuck the entire billionaire apparatus who are so deep in the circle jerk they don’t know how to come up for air and not act like fascists for 10 seconds. 

the Italian law is overly broad here, but that doesn’t excuse this behaviour. 

[–] SaltySalamander@fedia.io 47 points 1 day ago (7 children)

fuck American tech for one again operating in a country and refusing to follow their laws

Fuck government overreach. And fuck anyone defending it.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

There’s no way this was Cloudflare taking a stand for liberty and free speech. They are simply choosing to obey one less regulation. Less for them to do. Less to be accountable for. Less to special-case for one country.

These corporations hate being regulated - it could be by a direct popular ballot, not politicians, and they would still resist. Let’s not mistake corporate obstructionism for libertarianism.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago (3 children)

As a European, I've really come around to a more American view of Free Speech.

Over the last few years, we get more and more laws requiring more and more surveillance and censorship to protect copyright, stop hate speech, enforce GDPR, ... We're building up this infrastructure and the population thinks it's fine. The courts go along and ask for more.

What is going to happen when a European Trump comes to power? You think it's terrible that Big Tech goes along with Trump? That Must bought Twitter? We ain't seen nothing yet.

[–] Dayroom7485@lemmy.world 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah I don’t get that. How did free speech help when the Nazis humiliated jews publicly in the 1930s? How does it help now that the US president says that Somalis are trash people? Nick Fuentes saying the “organized Jewry in America” being a problem?

It seems obvious that I want the state to prevent hate speech, especially against minorities.

[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

How did free speech help when the Nazis humiliated jews publicly in the 1930s?

How did it help taking "jew-baiters" like Julius Streicher to court during the Weimar Republic? Obviously it didn't.

It seems obvious that I want the state to prevent hate speech, especially against minorities.

You want the state to act against hate speech coming from the elected head of state. What about that seems like a good plan?

You can't convince people that Trump is a bad guy, and so you want the state to go after the bad guys. Maybe you can convince people that the state should smash bad guys. It's not hard. But Trump is in charge of the state and not you. He'll decide who's a bad guy.

[–] mrgoosmoos@lemmy.ca 54 points 1 day ago (3 children)

just to be clear, it seems like you are referring to the claimed american view of free speech, not the reality

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

The US has no limits which is fucking stupid, meanwhile Canada has limits on hate speech while still being far more free than the US speech wise.

[–] lmmarsano@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 3 hours ago

limits on hate speech

which is bullshit: not being merely offended is not a fundamental liberty, no imminent risk of damage to an interest a person has a basic right to results from merely expressing an opinion.

such laws are readily abused

& ineffective at preventing the ideas & ideologies they oppose from taking root & gaining power. the advocates of repressive policies are only mildly inconvenienced or continue undeterred underground. the German AfD isn't struggling. far-right parties like Reform UK keep going. so, they fail to keep anyone in check while also undermining basic freedoms.

ability to justify truth & correctness is far more important than attempting to coerce conformity to correctness through dogma, taboo, & censorship. weak ability to justify makes people incompetent defenders & weak believers of correctness. individuals hone justifications & acquire competence to deliberate effectively through practice of vigorous & open deliberation with adversarial positions. censorship, even of incorrect belief, robs both those whose speech is suppressed and their audience of open deliberation they need to justify their beliefs and actions competently & effectively.

only cowards fear words.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›