this post was submitted on 11 Jan 2026
106 points (97.3% liked)

Selfhosted

60210 readers
970 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

Detailed Rules Post

  1. Be civil.

  2. No spam.

  3. Posts are to be related to self-hosting.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or readme if you're providing a link.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title.

  6. No trolling.

  7. Promotion posts require active participation, with an account that is at least 30 days old. F/LOSS without a paywall has exceptions, with requirements. See the rules link for details.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hello!! Some recent technical problems on my family's NAS gave me a big scare and finally pushed me to figure out a way to back it all up. I'm asking here specifically because I really don't know where to even starts because of the fact I've got just under 50 terabytes worth of data stored in a 7-disk RAID-5 and would prefer to keep it cheap. What are your suggestions?

Edit: thank you for all the suggestions, I'll probably be considering using Backblaze for backups, or perhaps seeing if I can scrounge up old unused disks from people I know. Thank you all again <3

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Scrollone@feddit.it 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Really? Do you have any source on that?

If it's true, I bet it's only if they're actually running without ever spinning down.

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Nothng official, sorry, wish I did!

Mostly personal experience. But that experience is also shared among a group of peers and friends in the SMB space where their clients think they can keep stuff on externals in an office safe only to find they've gone tits up nearly every time they pull them out a couple years later. And not the enclosures, the drives themselves - they all have external drive readers for just these kinds of circumstances.

In the enterprise you'd get laughed out of a datacenter for even suggesting cold drives for anything. Of course that's based around simple bit rot concerns, and why file systems like ZFS use a methodology to test/verify bits on a regular basis.

If nothing else, that bit rot should be enough of a reason to not store data on cold drives. It's not what drives were designed (or tested) to do.

Edit: Everything I've read over the years suggests failures happen as much from things like lubricants hardening from sitting as from bit rot. I've experienced both. I've seen drives that spin up after ten years but have numerous data errors, and drives that just won't spin up, while their counterparts that have run nearly continuously are fine (well, their bit-rot was caught by the OS and mitigated). With a running drive you have monitoring, so you know the state.

[–] Scrollone@feddit.it 1 points 5 months ago

But what about Amazon Glacier? That's exactly what they do. Cheap storage on cold drives.