this post was submitted on 12 Jan 2026
60 points (100.0% liked)
GenZedong
5041 readers
141 users here now
This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.
See this GitHub page for a collection of sources about socialism, imperialism, and other relevant topics.
This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.
We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.
Rules:
- No bigotry, anti-communism, pro-imperialism or ultra-leftism (anti-AES)
- We support indigenous liberation as the primary contradiction in settler colonies like the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Israel
- If you post an archived link (excluding archive.org), include the URL of the original article as well
- Unless it's an obvious shitpost, include relevant sources
- For articles behind paywalls, try to include the text in the post
- Mark all posts containing NSFW images as NSFW (including things like Nazi imagery)
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Weird outburst aside, it's actually kinda funny that the "shouldn't have stopped at Berlin" line sorta touches on the OG key theoretical divergence of Trotsky vs Stalin over permanent revolution. Trotsky was firmly a "shouldn't have stopped at Brest-Litovsk" guy in WW1 and if he were still alive by 1945 he would probably repeatedly point at "not stopping at Berlin" as proof of the USSR being a "degenerated worker state" and allying itself with capitalists.
I understand that the argument presented here was more moralistic and personalistic, but I like that it shines a light into the fact that, yeah, Trotsky wouldn't have stopped at Berlin. He would've also probably gotten the USSR invaded and completely destroyed in the early twenties.
Its about hindsight. Its not about exporting revolution to europe but wishing Stalin had struck a crippling blow to fascist that they couldn't recover from.
USSR thought incorrectly that the end of the 3rd reich would be the end of fascist aggression, at least for long enough that they could take care of domestic concerns without distraction.
Taking Berlin was only the first leg of defeating the threat of fascism. If Stalin knew what "peace" would look like maybe he would have just kept going instead of letting the fascists regroup and change tactics.
Fascism was on the ropes in 1945. Peace allowed them to turn USSR's allies into enemies and change tactics to asymmetrical warfare, economic war and dirty war.