this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2026
83 points (98.8% liked)

Europe

10088 readers
1234 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CombatWombatEsq@lemmy.world 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It’s dicey criticizing the FT because generally speaking they have some of the smartest people in money writing for them, but I think they may be somewhat overstating their position here.

They say:

That means that leveraging the aggregate sums is far from straightforward. In practice, it might even be impossible.

But I think that if you removed the USA from Annex 2 of the COMMISSION IMPLEMENTING DECISION (EU) 2021/1753 and from the list of nations in Credit Quality Step 1 as specified in Article 180 of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2015/35, you would see private investors selling off US Treasuries rather than buying other reserves to counterbalance the new risk suddenly on their balance sheets.

They also say:

A thing that people often forget is that every seller requires a buyer, and it’s unclear who would be willing to take the other side of any European fire sale of US assets.

But if I’m an EU legislator, I’m going to be asking, if we’re worried no-one will buy US Treasuries now, when US-based lenders are eager to repatriate US Treasuries to leverage lending for AI data center construction, why do we think there is going to be more of a market if the US is in a shooting war with the rest of NATO? Better to get while the getting’s good, rather than wait for the loss of blood and treasure.

[–] redditmademedoit@piefed.zip 3 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I think it's better to focus on the tail end of their arguments, as opposed to whether it's technically possible.

European banks and investors are stuffed with Treasuries. If they tumble in value because of a threat of a European boycott, then it would probably end up harming Europe just as much as the US, if not more so. Moreover, a large-scale repatriation of capital would send the dollar tumbling and the euro rocketing, which would alone possibly be enough to send many European countries into a recession.

For example, forcing your bank sector to sell off a bunch of assets that are considered "risk free", comes with consequences.

Also consider that a majority of European leaders seem to be banking on the whole Trump era to blow over at some point soon. They hope to be able to rely on the US again and don't really want to do any lasting harm (probably).

[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 7 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

For example, forcing your bank sector to sell off a bunch of assets that are considered "risk free", comes with consequences.

"Risk Free" tells me your mental models havent been absorbing recent changes. A US that is attacking former friends and allies and especially itself, who abandons any pretense of law and order, of the neutral functioning of predictable markets in a storm of serial extortionism, undermining their own labour pools, capital markets and central banking while going on a wild spending spree of unproductive thuggery and grift. (Pauses for breath.) You call that risk free?

Don't be the dude left holding the bag. US dollars debt and equities are poison. Contracts aren't legally enforceable and courts don't practice law, just applied politics.

Get out while you can. This shithole is going to collapse quickly.

[–] CombatWombatEsq@lemmy.world 3 points 3 weeks ago

I agree that the later half of the article is the stronger portion; I was just surprised to see the lower quality front half under the FT masthead. I also suspect you’re right about what the EU will do, rather than my focus on what they can do.

But if the FT’s argument is that the EU doesn’t have the stomach for a strong euro and reduced exports, that’s something that can change quickly. If your assumption is you can wait out the mad king, doing nothing is clearly the cheapest option. But if your assumption changes to be that you cannot (which it seems more and more people are coming to that conclusion) then you want to be the first to sell. Legal hurdles would be a much stronger constraint than EU leaders’ preferences.