this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2026
839 points (99.4% liked)

World News

52182 readers
3537 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Archive link

Donald Trump on Monday, January 19 threatened 200% tariffs on French wine and champagne over France's intentions to decline the US leader's invitation to join his "board of peace." The board was originally conceived to oversee the rebuilding of war-torn Gaza, but the charter does not appear to limit its role to the occupied Palestinian territory.

"I'll put a 200% tariff on his wines and champagnes. And he'll join. But he doesn't have to join," Trump said, referring to French President Emmanuel Macron. A source close to Macron told AFP on Monday that France "does not intend to answer favorably" to the invitation.

The board's charter "goes beyond the sole framework of Gaza," the source close to the French president said.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ramble81@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That’s always something that I’ve found interesting. If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, but it’s one perceived imaginary line over from where other ducks are…. It can’t be called a duck?

[–] WhiskyTangoFoxtrot@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's basically the same as trademark law. Anyone can make interlocking plastic bricks, but only Lego can make Lego.

[–] ramble81@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago

That’s actually a route I never thought of. We’ve closely conflated the name with the type that I don’t think about it that way. So really rather than a specific section for “champagne”, it should actually be a section for “sparkling wines” of which champagne would be in there.

Though that being said, usually a trademark is given to a single company. In this case it’s multiple companies using it, which is where it gets rocky. (Bourbon is another one too)

[–] criticon@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oh it can be called a duck, but not a "Mallard", "wood duck" or something specific like that unless it is from that species

All tequilas are agave distillates, but not all agave distillates are tequilas.

Tequila is an agave distillate, but unless it is from the specific region using an specific type of agave it can't be called tequila

[–] ramble81@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago

I’m thinking more of you’re using the exact same berry, use the same exact processs, but you just happened to be less than 60 miles north in Belgium, an imaginary line says you can’t call it Champaign. It’s just weird.