this post was submitted on 20 Jan 2026
41 points (97.7% liked)

Australia

4737 readers
222 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Tau@aussie.zone 18 points 21 hours ago (5 children)

It will be an offence to use a carriage service to access material on the manufacture or modification of guns and accessories, as well as other explosives or lethal devices.

This has such broad potential for misapplication, but apparently everyone throws critical thinking out the window because guns are scary...

I think the gun number limit is also a kneejerk reaction playing more on people's fears rather than actually being logical, but at least it's affecting less people than the above.

[–] Dimand@aussie.zone 10 points 19 hours ago

I would say it's pretty typical of all Aus communication and intelligence legislation from the last 20 years. Put total overreach into the legislation then apply it selectively, because scary terrorists or scary guns or fucking bunyips, idk.

I have seen a lot of wives and mates getting gun licences recently. Pretty easy way to overcome the rather pointless quantity limitations. In some ways I worry the number limits may actually increase the spread of firearms in the country.

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 4 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

Is “carriage service” a weird legal way of saying bus?

[–] Geobloke@aussie.zone 1 points 6 hours ago

Carriage service is pretty standard these days. Apparently it came about when people would transfer small amounts of money into other people's accounts with threatening messages attached to the transfer

[–] Tau@aussie.zone 4 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

It's a way of saying a method of transmitting information. Replace 'a carriage service' with 'the internet' and you'd cover much (albeit not all) of the intention there.

[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Oh I see. Doesn’t the anarchist cookbook txt that’s been going around for decades tell you how to make dum-dum rounds?

[–] Tau@aussie.zone 2 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Probably, I did find a copy of that as a kid but it's been long enough that I can't recall specifics.

That is something that could fall under the new rule though, as could watching youtube videos of people modding guns, or gun owners downloading a maintenance manual for the guns they own, or if particularly misapplied even things like getting an ebook that happens to mention an aside about weapons/explosive manufacture (pretty sure Jules Verne describes a way to make explosives in The Mysterious Island for example).

[–] naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 19 hours ago

Thought crime is so awesome.

You looking up info about poisonous plants? Clearly a murderer! Read true crime describing how someone stalked someone? Obviously you're about to do it.

Thought crime wooh all aboard the fucking thought crime train. Intent? Harm? No you thought bad thoughts and gained black and fell knowledge. To the torture cells with you!

[–] freedickpics@lemmy.ml 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

The whole law is one knee-jerk shitheap, brought on by a media and population demanding the government do 'something'

[–] naevaTheRat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 18 hours ago

There's precisely one thing in this law that might have actually prevented the massacre and it's the more rigourous background checks.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 2 points 19 hours ago

Tbh i think it's one of those laws they can throw to get you on something when they have nothing else.