this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2026
104 points (88.2% liked)
GenZedong
5041 readers
133 users here now
This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.
See this GitHub page for a collection of sources about socialism, imperialism, and other relevant topics.
This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.
We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.
Rules:
- No bigotry, anti-communism, pro-imperialism or ultra-leftism (anti-AES)
- We support indigenous liberation as the primary contradiction in settler colonies like the US, Canada, Australia, New Zealand and Israel
- If you post an archived link (excluding archive.org), include the URL of the original article as well
- Unless it's an obvious shitpost, include relevant sources
- For articles behind paywalls, try to include the text in the post
- Mark all posts containing NSFW images as NSFW (including things like Nazi imagery)
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
My POV is that yugo has a big audience and should be mindful of what he says, especially since he knows his audience is mostly baby leftists. And secondly Johnstone has herself gone on unhinged rants before:
She herself is a weird hodgepodge of liberalism and mildly progressive views. She's said several times she's not a communist and actively refuses to become one.
And when they're called out for it they double down trying to "explain" how they were right and then never change. They have 0 material analysis, they're just doing vibes-based politics. Is this how yugo wants to conduct politics with the masses? Would he publish this rant under a party name? If not, then why publish it on twitter under his own name? This is the kind of stuff you say with friends, and they gently steer you in the right direction.
Why are our idols now streamers and youtubers? Why do we care what these petty bourgeois enthusiasts who try to make a living taking money from baby comrades think about how struggle is conducted? Of course they'll defend their petty-bourgeois views when it comes down to it. That's what makes them money. Viki herself took a long break because she made, you guessed it, deeply ignorant remarks.
Yet they call for left-unity and expect us to side with their shit views and opinions, sweep them under the rug, while they continue on thinking and spouting whatever words they want. But it's us, the marxist-leninists, that have to be on our best behavior around them.
Like I don't know, I don't always have the right takes and I've made comments to people on the internet that I regret. I apologize to them and talk to friends to understand the problem and synthesize my own conclusion from it. I don't tell more principled people that they're the ones who need to change and not me, cause that's what they're doing here. Coming from caitlin and vicki, it's deeply selfish and self-centered to say this. They think because they're big names with an audience that automatically makes them right and everyone else wrong.
When Lenin said "Among the Jews there are workers, toilers, they are in the majority. They are our brothers, comrades in the struggle for Socialism, because they are oppressed by capitalism. Among the Jews there are Kulaks, exploiters, capitalists, just like amongst us all," he preceded it with:
Notice Lenin didn't say "you must have faulty genes if you believe otherwise you disabled r-word".
Criticism and self-criticism is a core component of marxism to progress forward. Normally it implies we find issues to remedy and then remedy them, so we all progress together. In this case, I'm not really sure where to even begin. I think it speaks for itself (esp. the "now I'm not calling them the r-word, just the diminutive that's acceptable in your circles :)")
But people don't deserve to have their shit takes swept under the rug just because they're nominally on "our side". He chose to publish this on Twitter and leave it up, what are we supposed to do? Smile while he continues saying whatever unhinged shit crosses his mind that day under the shower, never getting challenged for it? What example does this set for the new leftists that watch him, who start to think communism is just about appearing edgy and being counter-culture?
I want to leave one last thought; you suggest to debate rightists, but why not rightist views and right deviationist views? Not everyone who calls themselves a communist is immediately our comrade, people don't suddenly develop all the correct theory and ideas as soon as they proclaim themselves to be a marxist.
I wrote a long answer(, in which i agree with a lot of things you said, it was well-written and thank you for taking such a long time), but i won't post it since you banned me.
I just want to say as my last words that i could have banned you for saying that C.Johnstone is a liberal with midly progressive views, or that yugopnik is defending petty-bourgeois views, clearly crazy opinions. Of course i wouldn't do that because everyone makes mistakes, but i could have, and you think it couldn't happen to you but i wouldn't ask for your opinion, you'd just be banned whether it's just or not.
Bye.
Actually i was the one one who reported you and got you banned. It wasn't for some arbitrary reason it was for using the r-slur then implying its acceptable as "its the official terminology" despite it being horribly offensive, ableist, and archaic. This is why I left the post explaining areas of growth that you should focus on.
Id completely support you getting unbanned if you touch some grass and ask someone with an intellectual disabiltiy themselves whether or not the r-slur is acceptable.
I didn't ban you.
Then i owe you an apology.
(I still won't answer you since that'd be going further in the ban evasion, and it's too long you have better things to do, but in short they tolerate our leftism but we don't tolerate theirs, sometimes cancelling them but we need numbers, so-called "antifas" tried to cancel people like Étienne Chouard or David Rovics, yugopnik could hopefully understand your point and his tweet wasn't meant to be taken that seriously, he's just saying half-jokingly "i can't explain it otherwise because the far-right is not logical by any mean !", good quote&point from Lenine, saying that people from the far-right ought to have lost some chromosomes would be an ableist joke ?, that post isn't helpful to yugopnik in the way you're presenting it since he won't see it so that's more like talking in his back, nor is it addressed in a loving manner, i don't believe you intended to harm him though because you'd have been contented with knowing that he understood his mistake, and also because as you say you were opposing the rightist view and not the leftist individual)
I think it's better to write that than nothing. I don't intend to come back here because in that comment i ended up complaining about the downvotes solely because the mods were scaring me, it's not an enjoyable feeling.
But please take care of lemmygrad, it's an important place on Lemmy and i'm still glad that it exists.