this post was submitted on 26 Jan 2026
104 points (88.2% liked)

GenZedong

5041 readers
134 users here now

This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.

See this GitHub page for a collection of sources about socialism, imperialism, and other relevant topics.

This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.

We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Some people don't believe me when I try to warn them about the content creator grift. I don't care, I'm coming for all of them if they start spouting shit like this to their audience. They have a responsibility towards their viewers.

Second time I see him tweet shit like this.

At this point he should just stop pretending he's any sort of leftist. His mental health will thank him.

archive link so he can't scrub it off the internet: https://archive.ph/XWZD6 (still loading as of posting but should be ready eventually)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] darkernations@lemmygrad.ml 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

I think this is a logical conclusion if one believes "brainwashing" on mass is a thing for an explanation of the bourgoisie proleteriat; it will lead to a biolgical determinist rationale for resistance to being "unbrainwashed" and then it's a short hop from that to eugenicism echoing essentially fascist sentiments.

Instead consider a more dialectical materialist take:

https://redsails.org/masses-elites-and-rebels/

Ie narratives as a social license for bigotry along imperialist and settler colonial lines because at some level that individual benefits from those material conditions. The material always come before the idea.

(There's all sorts of other problems with yugopnik's take - like folks with learning difficulties who don't lean right wing, removing the agency of the fascist, using ablism to explain fascism, where these Nietzschean takes of the untermenschen comes from, mechanical vs dialectical materialism etc etc)