this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2026
695 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

79879 readers
3683 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
695
The TV industry finally concedes that the future may not be in 8K (arstechnica.com)
submitted 1 day ago by TheImpressiveX@lemmy.today to c/technology@lemmy.world
306 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] jordanlund@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

65" and it's impressive with ONE drawback... Samsungs HDR implementation SUCKS. Suuuuuuuucks.

Without HDR, everything is bright, crisp, and clean.

With HDR, it's dark, muddy, and unwatchable.

I've done all the firmware updates, RTINGS calibrations, NOTHING works.

Well, nothing except disabling HDR on every device attached to it.

[โ€“] ReallyActuallyFrankenstein@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 1 day ago

Hmm, that's both impressive and disappointing. I'd think for a 65" you'd need to be super close to tell. I assume it's Samsung's HDR10 (or +) standard since they refuse to put Dolby Vision on their sets.