this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2026
475 points (98.0% liked)

World News

52854 readers
2545 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/42475417

There it is folks.

Remember that name: Chabad-Lubavitch

declassified FBI memo from the Epstein files, released on Friday, includes incendiary allegations about US President Donald Trump.

The memo says that Trump was “compromised by Israel”, that convicted paedophile Jeffrey Epsteinworked with Israeli intelligence, and that a Jewish religious group calling itself Chabad-Lubavitch sought to hijack his first term in office.

The memo, written in 2020, formed part of an FBI investigation into domestic or foreign influence over the US electoral process. It draws on information from a confidential human source (CHS) and appears among a vast trove of Epstein-related files released by the US Justice Department.

“CHS advised Chabad is doing everything they can to co-opt the Trump presidency,” the memo states regarding his first term. 

Chabad-Lubavitch, a religious Jewish sect founded in Russia, has grown to an estimated 90,000 members. Its messianic, ultra-Orthodox ideology has repeatedly been linked to hardline settler colonial politics in Palestine.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (3 children)

~~Say the line, Bart!~~ OOPS, I initially misread your post, I thought you were yelling at people who voted for neither Harris nor Trump as a principled anti-Israel position, not people who voted for Trump for supposedly being the lesser pro-Israel candidate. Obviously I didn't vote for Trump, and obviously fuck Trump and his supporters and voters.

Gonna leave the quote tho because it's always One Day Everyone Will Have Always Been Against This-o-clock.


But the moral prohibition on siding with any administration that endorses genocide will force a different flavor of the exact same logic that centrist liberalism has depended on for so long: hold your nose and align with the least worst thing. Only the least worst thing will no longer be the mild, ethics-agnostic emptiness of modern Western liberalism, nor will it be the multitude of barbaric authoritarians and their secret prisons. It will be communal solidarity, or else nothing, a walking away from all of this. Countless otherwise pragmatic people who would in any other circumstance choose liberalism by default will instead decide none of this is worth the damage to one’s soul. They will instead support no one, vote for no one, wash their hands of any ordering of the world that results in choices no better than this. And the obvious centrist refrain—But do you want the deranged right wing to win?—should, after even a moment of self-reflection, yield to a far more important question: How empty does your message have to be for a deranged right wing to even have a chance of winning? Of all the epitaphs that may one day be written on the gravestone of Western liberalism, the most damning is this: Faced off against a nihilistic, endlessly cruel manifestation of conservatism, and somehow managed to ~~make it c~~lose.

— Omar El-Akkad, One Day Everyone Will Have Always Been Against This, correction mine.

[–] Visstix@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

So you say fuck trump and then let him win because both candidates are pro israel?

[–] Tuscy@lemmy.world 0 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

That’s how they get you. “Oh atleast I’m picking the lesser evil.” Thats like going to hell but with extra steps. So you can feel self righteous while going there.

[–] Visstix@lemmy.world 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Ok so how is this trump term going? Was it the right choice?

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 3 points 5 hours ago

It's so weird how so many people just can't admit to being wrong.

[–] PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (2 children)

Buddy I'm just some dude with zero power and zero ability to individually change the trajectory of this fascist country. I didn't let these fuckers do shit. The capitalist class is fully culpable for their own crimes.

And also what part of "...moral prohibition on siding with

ANY

administration that endorses

GENOCIDE

..." is unclear to you?

Like one simply cannot do a genocide and ever expect literally any goodwill from me ever again, certainly not a vote, but I wouldn't even piss on these fucks if they were on fire. And I'm not even the teeniest tiniest bit sorry if "I unconditionally refuse to support genocidaires" is a controversial opinion to you, and I literally never will be. Fuck Trump, fuck Harris, fuck Biden, fuck Obama, fuck Bush, fuck Clinton, and fuck every other president, and fuck the whole the goddamn AmeriKKKa settler project for the rest of fucking time.

[–] Visstix@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

So you are ok with whatever ice is doing? Cause you were gonna get genocide no matter what, now you got ice on top of it.

[–] PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S@lemmy.sdf.org -2 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

Of course I'm not okay with what ICE is doing! Biden and Obama were doing ICE too, and Harris would have done it just as hard as Trump, just in "norm-preserving" ways, as did Biden and Obama and Bush as long as ICE existed. And if Harris was elected, vote-Blue-no-matter-who liberals wouldn't fucking care because they don't want to abolish ICE.

[–] Visstix@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago

Bullshit. No way it would have been this bad.

[–] MadBits@europe.pub 2 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (2 children)

Don't let them divide us. Treat each other with kindness—that's how we resist. Throughout history, they have thrived by pitting people against each other. They enslaved populations, displaced indigenous peoples, and extracted wealth for centuries. Be it zionist USSR, be it colonial Britain, all of them built wealth paid with blood by the people.

The founding of Israel shows how this pattern continued after WWII. David Ben-Gurion declared independence as the British Mandate ended, following the UN's partition plan. It immediately sparked the 1948 Arab-Israeli War and displaced hundreds of thousands of Palestinians.

Those in power benefit when we're divided by ethnicity, religion, or nationality. When we fight each other, we're easier to control. Our unity is their greatest threat. Stand together, reject division. In the end, they will be hunted down and held accountable, although the atrocities they committed will never be paid for at its fullest.

The world ruling elites are the same club that has been ruling over nations for many, many, many years.

[–] Grail@multiverse.soulism.net 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Is that em-dash AI generated?

[–] MadBits@europe.pub 1 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

> — <

—_—

[–] PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I want the thickest possible wall between me and the genocide supporters. Like of course, within the resistance I want to unite and not be divisive, but if we allow genocide supporters into the movement then it ain't worth shit.

No kindness for monsters, and we need to be firm with pulling people away from falling in line with the monsters.

[–] MadBits@europe.pub 1 points 11 hours ago

The problem is that too many people aren't paying attention or lack the awareness to see what's happening. Power gets placed in the hands of those who are easily manipulated—precisely so the masses will fight each other while thinking they're doing good. Our only real solution is unity. We can't push people away just because they have different opinions. Some are blinded by misinformation, some are lost in their own bubbles, some can't accept the truth because of ego, and yes—some do have bad intentions. But most don't. We need to distinguish between those who are misled and those who are deliberately causing harm. Rejecting everyone who disagrees only strengthens the division that benefits those in power. Meet people where they are, challenge ideas with patience, and build bridges wherever possible. Division is their strategy. Unity is ours.

[–] Tuscy@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

So it’s actually less damning for the soul to vote neither.. because you have no choice in the matter to begin with. It’s a bullshit facade. Contribute to lesser evil or more evil. How about don’t contribute and just let them roll over you because ultimately it mean death anyways but at least this way it’s better for your soul because you didn’t partake in any evil. Sort of like “the road to hell is paved with good intentions” but since we’re all going to hell anyways at least you didn’t pave the road there.

[–] PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

How about don’t contribute and just let them roll over you

I am not saying to just let them roll over us. Do anything else. Voting is a form of letting them roll over us, it's just the version of getting rolled that lets you feel better than everyone else and serves as a pressure valve for righteous proletarian fury.

[–] Tuscy@lemmy.world 0 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Hey buddy I’m agreeing with you 100% I’m not saying you have a choice but to LET them roll over you. It’s a non choice. It’s gonna happen. So this way you still have some dignity. “You’re not firing me, I’m quitting.”

[–] PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

Okay fine, but we can fight in ways that are outside of voting. 🙂

[–] Tuscy@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago

Woah buddy, are you calling for some kind of vigilantism? .. you son of a bitch, I’m in.

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 2 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I mean, the protest non-voters are also fucking morons. But yes, Trump voters especially.

[–] PM_ME_VINTAGE_30S@lemmy.sdf.org 0 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I mean, the protest non-voters are also fucking morons.

Ah yes, thank you for giving me a second chance to correctly apply this quote:

But the moral prohibition on siding with any administration that endorses genocide will force a different flavor of the exact same logic that centrist liberalism has depended on for so long: hold your nose and align with the least worst thing. Only the least worst thing will no longer be the mild, ethics-agnostic emptiness of modern Western liberalism, nor will it be the multitude of barbaric authoritarians and their secret prisons. It will be communal solidarity, or else nothing, a walking away from all of this. Countless otherwise pragmatic people who would in any other circumstance choose liberalism by default will instead decide none of this is worth the damage to one’s soul. They will instead support no one, vote for no one, wash their hands of any ordering of the world that results in choices no better than this. And the obvious centrist refrain—But do you want the deranged right wing to win?—should, after even a moment of self-reflection, yield to a far more important question: How empty does your message have to be for a deranged right wing to even have a chance of winning? Of all the epitaphs that may one day be written on the gravestone of Western liberalism, the most damning is this: Faced off against a nihilistic, endlessly cruel manifestation of conservatism, and somehow managed to ~~make it c~~lose.

— Omar El-Akkad, One Day Everyone Will Have Always Been Against This, correction mine.