this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2026
760 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

79983 readers
4056 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] magic_smoke@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

No, my point was that people don't need higher resolution TV's, they need good transcodes that don't look like shit.

Streaming services run at bitrates/codecs that look like dookie compared to bd rips even on my shitty $100 sceptre 1080p Amazon special TV.

Who the fuck is gonna buy an 8K oled panel when no ones willing to conveniently provide content that looks good on it, or even content that pushes their current TV to its fullest extant?

Its not like anyone can afford a GPU that renders modern games at a playable framerate to that either.

[โ€“] jj4211@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Ah, ok, that's fair. I agree that codec/bitrate choice has made a lot of ostensibly '4k' content look like crap, so why have 8k when many providers/internet connections won't even cover the requisite detail to drive 4k in streaming.