this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2026
272 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

80478 readers
3772 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The FBI has been unable to access a Washington Post reporter’s seized iPhone because it was in Lockdown Mode, a sometimes overlooked feature that makes iPhones broadly more secure, according to recently filed court records.

The court record shows what devices and data the FBI was able to ultimately access, and which devices it could not, after raiding the home of the reporter, Hannah Natanson, in January as part of an investigation into leaks of classified information. It also provides rare insight into the apparent effectiveness of Lockdown Mode, or at least how effective it might be before the FBI may try other techniques to access the device.

“Because the iPhone was in Lockdown mode, CART could not extract that device,” the court record reads, referring to the FBI’s Computer Analysis Response Team, a unit focused on performing forensic analyses of seized devices. The document is written by the government, and is opposing the return of Natanson’s devices.

Archive: http://archive.today/gfTg9

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 46 points 4 hours ago (3 children)

GrapheneOS is ~10x more private and secure than iOS.

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 69 points 4 hours ago (7 children)
[–] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 4 points 27 minutes ago

Up voting because you made be lol, not because I agree with you. Been on GOS for over a year, it's not that bad. A few apps don't work, it's only slightly inconvenient.

[–] circuscritic@lemmy.ca 11 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

It's not a hobby.

Don't confuse Graphene with a tinker box, or some ROM you once rooted.

It's a professionally polished and very secure fork of Android.

There are some minor limitations with a handful apps that can't pass their Google specific internal security checks, but there's lists of them that you can check to see if any are a deal breaker for you.

[–] Truscape@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Safely using an insecure device swiftly becomes a hobby, unless you give in to the default experience.

I installed GrapheneOS, installed my apps, and I'm done. If I want to deny telemetry or to set up something like the duress password, it's one to two taps.

iPhone users, man... stop drinking the fucking punch.

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world -2 points 2 hours ago

I'm not an iPhone user. I don't own an Apple anything and really despise them as a company. Stop making stupid assumptions.

[–] extremeboredom@lemmy.world 10 points 2 hours ago

I've used GOS daily for years. Your characterization of the OS as a "hobby" could not be further from the truth. After some basic initial configuration, it simply works like any other phone. My bank app works. Every app they told me would not work, works fine. Honestly, I'm beginning to wonder if all this FUD is a result of personal lack of willingness to do the research or something more nefarious like intentional misinformation.

[–] Attacker94@lemmy.world 27 points 4 hours ago (3 children)

Discounting some minor comparability issues, the process just requires a computer, an internet connection, a cable, and the ability to read through a couple paragraphs of instruction.

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 27 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (4 children)

I'm talking about daily use. I have a good friend, we've both been computer nerds since The Apple II era, we both used to put custom roms on our android phones, we're avid self hosters, etc... He recently switched to Graphene and wants to switch back to something that's less of a pain. His complaints are pretty much the same as reasons I haven't switched. I warned him it would be an adjustment.

[–] napoleonsdumbcousin@feddit.org 12 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

As someone who uses GrapheneOS with sandboxed GooglePlay on his only smartphone (with daily usage for years at this point): I don't know what kind of adjustment you are referring to. I never had to adjust to anything, because I never encountered anything that GrapheneOS couldn't do that stock Android could. Follow the installation process and after that the phone behaves like a regular phone, except you have way more options regarding security and privacy.

Is your friend trying to use GrapheneOS without any Google services maybe?

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

I had to fiddle with some stuff to get the Google location history and Android Auto working. But if you're using it for privacy-from-Google purposes you probably don't care about those.

Edit: also RCS and tap to pay with credit/debit card. Those require your carrier and Google to allow them, respectively.

My own personal experience over the past year with it has... Largely not lined up with that? The install process was easy, I do have gplay enabled but rarely use it, favoring fdroid, and it's... Been fine? It's felt mostly like stock android tbh

So you haven't used it yourself and are shitting on an OS based on anecdotal evidence? "Stop making stupid assumptions”, I once heard someone say.

I use GrapheneOS and have helped other less tech-savvy people install and use it. You can just roll with the defaults and have a better privacy stance than the spyware Google puts out, or you can take a deep dive. It works just fine either way.

[–] MyNameIsAtticus@lemmy.world 9 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

That’s the same thing stopping me from switching my friends from Linux. I know one of them would if I pushed.

I’ve been daily driving Linux for almost 2 years and also always have a minor issue daily. “Oh. Bluetooth module decided it just didn’t want to work. Better reload. Oh. Reloading doesn’t work? Got to restart. Oh. Now my Wi-Fi has completely crapped the bed and restarts every 5 seconds”.

Then the major issues are catastrophic, even though rare. I once had a system just start… filling up empty storage at a rate of 1 GB a second with an empty log file. I couldn’t figure out why. Ended up reinstalling everything.

I don’t mind fixing these issues. And hell, I have fun, but I’m the only computer guy in our group though so I’d be playing tech support for these people if they ever changed.

[–] 20dogs@feddit.uk 7 points 3 hours ago

What distro are you using? This seems bizarre and the sort of thing you see on a less stable rolling release.

[–] DelightfullyDivisive@discuss.online 4 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (2 children)

I'm an experienced technologist (a software engineer for over 30 years), I used to regularly install CyanogenMod on my phones. While I didn't find the graphene OS installation to be particularly difficult, I did find actually using it to be too much of a challenge to live with every day. The biggest single problem I can recall is that I could not do any group ~~SMS~~ MMS texts. Many searches and attempts at fixes later, I realized that it was a known bug that for reasons unknown did not seem to affect all users. There were a number of minor annoyances in addition to that bug.

That may reflect more on how Google has locked down things on the pixel phones, or other stuff they've done to keep things as proprietary as possible in their software and devices. I switched back because it wasn't worth the hassle to me.

That's odd, group texts works fine on my phone.

[–] ozymandias117@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

You can't send group texts over SMS

I'd guess the group chat is stuck sending messages to RCS (basically Google Proprietary) rather than MMS

This is the same problem iPhone users have dealt with for a long time when switching to Android and their number is stuck in Apple's iMessage system

Corrected to MMS.

[–] kinkles@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 hours ago

My friend tried using it last year and he started getting some super annoying RCS issues that caused him to switch back to iPhone. He was very invested in using graphene but it became too much.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 6 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

That's not what you said. But since you did, it's very easy to install and use. No hobby required.

[–] U7826391786239@lemmy.zip 0 points 4 hours ago

come onnnnn

this shit is fun!

[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 4 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Sigh, how, just how do you quantify that?

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 0 points 3 hours ago (1 children)
[–] stoy@lemmy.zip 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

So your comment is just fanboy bullshit?

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 0 points 2 hours ago