this post was submitted on 10 Feb 2026
191 points (99.5% liked)

World News

55284 readers
2105 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A South Korean official was expelled from his political party for suggesting the country “import” Vietnamese and Sri Lankan women to boost the declining birth rate.

Kim Hee Soo, the governor of the southern Jindo county in South Jeolla province, was facing an uproar after his televised remarks last week triggered a diplomatic protest from Vietnam. Mr Kim was addressing a town hall meeting when he spoke about measures to address the country’s declining birth rate.

He said South Korea could “import young unmarried women” from places like Sri Lanka or Vietnam to be married off to “young men in rural areas".

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Every developed country goes the same way. Some, like the US, are able to attract enough immigration to compensate.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de -2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Pretty sure rome didn't survive for a couple thousand years on immigrants. Neither has England. If your idea of a fix is importing a constant supply of people (most immigrants going to any country don't tend to show up wealthy either, I might add) to keep up the status quo, you're running on a broken system.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

You mistake me completely. I’m not advertising the virtues of this system at all. I’m just pointing out that there is nothing Korean or American about declining birth rates. This is a universal phenomenon of a society’s transition from agrarianism where more hands = more wealth to an educated, skilled labor force where each child requires a significant investment.

The US and, for example, Germany use immigration to offset this and keep their population growing. That’s simply a fact you can look up. Japan for example doesn’t want to do this and they’re dealing with the consequences of population decline. This is all over the news for years now.

I’m not saying this is good or bad or anything. This is just the way things are.

Your bit about Ancient Rome is a good laugh because it was hardly a developed society by today’s standards and it did indeed run on imported labor, except they called them slaves. So you are at once off base and also wrong.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's not the issue. Wealth became too consolidated. America's baby boomers weren't born for efficiency of labor hands. They were born because one person could work one full time job at most employers and afford a house, a car, bills, a few kids, and a vacation every year.

Now that's not possible for very much of the workforce at all. Raising kids hasn't gotten that much more expensive to raise in relation to other basic needs. It's just that all those other basic needs tend to take up a lot bigger portion of your paycheck. People already struggling don't want to add children to the pile of their struggles.

[–] EndlessNightmare@reddthat.com 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If your idea of a fix is importing a constant supply of people (most immigrants going to any country don’t tend to show up wealthy either, I might add) to keep up the status quo, you’re running on a broken system.

In contrast to expecting population to grow ad infinitum?

If you build your economic system as a pyramid scheme, you are building in failure.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 1 month ago

and upside down pyramid.