this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2026
135 points (91.4% liked)

Technology

81026 readers
4777 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
135
Discord walks back age verification fears for most users (www.techbuzz.ai)
submitted 3 hours ago by ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online to c/technology@lemmy.world
45 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Too late assholes... I'm already deleting most of the posts I made on my discord and I will be migrating elsewhere soon.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kinkles@sh.itjust.works 69 points 3 hours ago* (last edited 3 hours ago) (1 children)

This is misleading. Discord is not reversing course. It was in their original announcement that they would try to automatically determine everyone’s age and “most” people won’t need to do any sort of verification. A lot of people and journalists didn’t read that far apparently.

[–] hobovision@mander.xyz 9 points 1 hour ago

Yes, they aren't changing course, but Discord certainly did not say "most" in the announcement and it was a single sentence in a long article about age verification and content gating. They should have been far more upfront about their inference method being the primary one in the first place. This was a communication issue and not a reader issue.

It's also possible they decided to tune their inference model to be a lot more, let's say, permissive so that there isn't a huge backlash of people getting asked to provide ID when they've been using the service for nearly a decade or longer.