The Deprogram

Then you should also know through the dialectical method that everything is constantly changing and material conditions are never static. Therefore, this monolithic truth you're clinging to is also constantly evolving, requiring regular reanalysis.

China is the number 1 enemy for the west and you want them to ruin all hard earned relations with them for what exactly?

What good are those hard earned relations if they can and will just be steamrolled by the fascist war machine unless they capitulate?

Throwing out moralist opinions based on dogmatic ideals is not criticism. Again, read the thread and you can find actual criticisms and their answers.

I derived my conclusion from material and historical analysis. What happened when other nations attempted appeasement with the last expanding fascist empire? Another user used an analogy of the Molotov-Ribbentrop Pact in regard to China's reserved strategy. Should the same nightmare scenario unfold, who would join them in the fight as the other Allies joined the USSR? Now these are considerably different material conditions from the present day, especially with the absence of nukes at that time. Nonetheless, China could have provided more support to the states that it has friendly relations with. They're certainly not making the case that they are trustworthy allies to the rest of the world.

I'm beginning to digress a bit with that point.

Other historical examples that support my argument are Korea and Vietnam. Providing support allowed them to hold the US empire at bay, bogging them down in an unwinnable guerilla war on foreign soil.

I'm not calling for open warfare here. I'm suggesting some material/intelligence/advisory support could've made some difference in the numerous theaters the US has engaged in over the last year. Also stopping trade with a state actively involved in genocide. Most of the current liberal/neoliberal governments may not have agreed with the move, but it would've likely changed some opinions on China for the better amongst the general populous who appear to mostly disagree with their governments opinions on the matter.

China has enough economic weight from manufacturing and now imports of consumer goods that they could have kept any significant economic retaliation at bay. Just look at the back and forth with the US with tariffs.

I'm willing to admit they could be making the right move. Looking at all the variables, my analysis leans towards no. We won't know for sure until things play out.

They have done insanely well so far and you should have some respect towards the people that are actually fighting against the empire and are getting closer in over taking it. Just an insane amount of hubris that you think that your "criticisms" can hold any water to the communist party of china and their decision making.

Is it really hubris to speak my mind and disagree? Should I just blindly accept the decisions of a state apparatus I have no involvement with? Were it my own and I a contributing member, I would still speak my mind. Then I would follow the collective decision, as democratic centralism instructs.

 You are the one that has refused to engage in discussion and debate. I told you multiple time to take to the thread and actually read it.

You responded to my comment with yada yada, then called me a racist failure. That's no way to engage in discussion. I read the comments. They took entirely different routes than what I was saying. Your insults do nothing but erode any perception of sincerity or credibility you might have.