this post was submitted on 16 Feb 2026
49 points (100.0% liked)

GenZedong

5076 readers
85 users here now

This is a Dengist community in favor of Bashar al-Assad with no information that can lead to the arrest of Hillary Clinton, our fellow liberal and queen. This community is not ironic. We are Marxists-Leninists.

See this GitHub page for a collection of sources about socialism, imperialism, and other relevant topics.

This community is for posts about Marxism and geopolitics (including shitposts to some extent). Serious posts can be posted here or in /c/GenZhou. Reactionary or ultra-leftist cringe posts belong in /c/shitreactionariessay or /c/shitultrassay respectively.

We have a Matrix homeserver and a Matrix space. See this thread for more information. If you believe the server may be down, check the status on status.elara.ws.

Rules:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Welcome again to everybody. Make yourself at home. In the time-honoured tradition of our group, here is the weekly discussion thread.

Matrix homeserver and space
Theory discussion group on /c/theory@lemmygrad.ml
Find theory on ProleWiki, marxists.org, Anna's Archive

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] clot27@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The thing he did like opening up china for foreign capital, existence of billionaires, etc

[–] davel@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

China wouldn’t have made it this far without “opening up,” the purpose of which was to accelerate the development of the productive forces by importing capital, technology, and knowledge from advanced capitalist states.

The capitalist states didn’t realize this at the time, though. They thought China’s “opening up” was the “liberalization” of China, as happened to the USSR. China punked them. The West de-industrialized itself for “cheap” labor, and now China holds the cards.

[–] 6kb_@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

https://redsails.org/china-has-billionaires/ not trying to be adversarial! but this is a useful writeup about china i refer a lot of people to a lot of the time about topics like this, if it's being brought up to argue a potential betrayal of socialism. in fact, whenever i see that phrase i perk up like a sleeper agent

[–] Cowbee@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Analyzed metaphysically, ie stripping it of the context for why this happened, can make it seem pretty bad. But when viewed dialectically, ie placing it in its correct moment in time and as a response to China's gross underdevelopment, it has paid off enormously. New contradictions arose, of course, but with it socialism has been maintained and we are now witnessing the era of imperialist decay and rising socialism.

I highly recommend this conversation I had with another user, one opposed to "Dengism" (initially, perhaps not by the end). Both of us flesh out our points and speak from a place of trying to understand one another, which was quite productive compared to liberal debate-as-bloodsport.