World News
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF OCTOBER 19 2025
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
view the rest of the comments
Yeah, so let the father suffer the rest of his life knowing his daughter killed herself... If my daughter wanted to do that, ill or not, I'd fight for her life, not applaud the fact she won the right to assisted suicide...
Yes, I get it, she has a psychiatric illness now with chronic pain due to a previous suicide attempt, but it didn't rally mention any attempts at either treating her issues or how actually severe it was. A lot of people can self-diagnose "depression" or other illnesses, and the article doesn't do a good job explaining actual severity, just sounds like they also support her by how is written.
Idk, the whole assisted suicide is such a fucked concept and a lot of grey area!
Euthanasia is not something that's allowed on a whim. It typically requires psychological evaluation, a prognosis that doesn't allow for recovery or improvement, and a lengthy process to get approval. You can't just walk into a doctor's office, tell them you're in pain and want to die, and have them hook you up to an IV.
Why do you think the father's desire to keep her alive should trump her own bodily autonomy and right to choose for herself?
She's his daughter, not his property. Somebody seeking medical aid in dying doesn't just grab a ticket and get in line for the headsman to take a little off the top, there's more to it but those are discussions between the adult patient and medical professionals.
He has the right to be sad but that doesn't mean he gets any more say in the matter than Fulano de Tal off the street.
Did you read it?
Did you read my comment
So, you think she should live in physical and mental agony, so dad doesn't have to be sad?
If it went like that, if her dad ever emotionally matures enough to feel the guilt of forcing her to do that, the mental hit he'd take would be a million times worse.
At that point, not only would the daughter be in pain, it would be his fault.
None of this involves self-diagnosis. You can't just ask for assisted suicide. Like others are commenting, in countries that allow it, the process is rigorous.
Requests for assisted suicide are not granted if there's reasonable chance of improvement. The article may not state it, but if the Spanish high court agrees with her you can be sure every possible treatment has been tried and failed.
It's Spain. She has all possible means at her disposal to treat her issues. You must be American to write this.
Clearly you didn't read and comprehend the article