this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2026
259 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

81759 readers
3141 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
259
The Age Verification Trap... Verifying user’s ages undermines everyone’s data protection (spectrum.ieee.org)
submitted 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) by Beep@lemmus.org to c/technology@lemmy.world
11 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Hacker News.

Social media is going the way of alcohol, gambling, and other social sins: societies are deciding it’s no longer kids’ stuff. Lawmakers point to compulsive use, exposure to harmful content, and mounting concerns about adolescent mental health. So, many propose to set a minimum age, usually 13 or 16.

In cases when regulators demand real enforcement rather than symbolic rules, platforms run into a basic technical problem. The only way to prove that someone is old enough to use a site is to collect personal data about who they are. And the only way to prove that you checked is to keep the data indefinitely. Age-restriction laws push platforms toward intrusive verification systems that often directly conflict with modern data-privacy law.

This is the age-verification trap. Strong enforcement of age rules undermines data privacy.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] troyunrau@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 hours ago (3 children)

The end of the anonymous web is nigh. We may not like it, but it's probably the only way. We used to joke in the 90s about requiring an internet driver's license before allowing people on Usenet. It might actually be happening.

[–] Cherry@piefed.social 1 points 16 minutes ago

TBF in recent years there’s little of it worth visiting.

[–] OctopusNemeses@lemmy.world 1 points 54 minutes ago* (last edited 53 minutes ago)

The end social media maybe. It's fundamentally broken anyways. They can keep breaking it worse for all I care.

We're not meant to be ruled by algorithms. It was a stupid idea to listen to antisocial neckbeards selling the world on how they could master sociology with graph theory. These are the same geniuses who deride soft sciences as not real science.

[–] DrunkenPirate@feddit.org 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

And it might be a good decision in the dawn of the bot-internet. It forces even bots to be traceable to some real person or getting no access to the mentioned platforms. May be even bot-free platforms

[–] troyunrau@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 hours ago

Hypothetically: Lemmy instances where every user has to have physically met an admin and proved that they're real or something. And they'll only federate to other instances following the same rules.

It'll almost be like the early 90s dialup BBS small communities, with FIDOnet ;)