this post was submitted on 23 Feb 2026
713 points (97.6% liked)

Technology

82000 readers
3648 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
713
Car Wash Test on 53 leading AI models: "I want to wash my car. The car wash is 50 meters away. Should I walk or drive?" (opper.ai)
submitted 5 days ago by fubarx@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
344 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Screenshot of this question was making the rounds last week. But this article covers testing against all the well-known models out there.

Also includes outtakes on the 'reasoning' models.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] turboSnail@piefed.europe.pub 4 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Well, they are language models after all. They have data on language, not real life. When you go beyond language as a training data, you can expect better results. In the meantime, these kinds of problems aren’t going anywhere.

[–] VoterFrog@lemmy.world 4 points 3 days ago

Why act like this is an intractable problem? Several of the models succeeded 100% of the time. That is the problem "going somewhere." There's clearly a difference in the ability to handle these problems in a SOTA models compared to others.

[–] trublu@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 3 days ago

See, that's not even an accurate criticism because part of language is meaning. This test is a test of an LLM having enough "intelligence" to understand that you can't wash your car without your car being at the car wash. If you see the language presented in this test and don't immediately realize that it would be a problem, then you haven't understood the language. These are large language models failing at comprehending any language. Because there's no intelligence there. Because they're just random word guessers.

[–] dil@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 days ago

Language model means you communictae through natural language I thought

[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 1 points 3 days ago

Cool insight that is wrong in entirely unfortunate but I get it