this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2025
10 points (72.7% liked)

Selfhosted

46265 readers
446 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hi! I'm looking for an open-source, preferably FOSS video transcoding web interface.

I would like the transcoding to be done on the server side, be secured by a password if possible (so people don't 100% the server), and I want no data sharing. Most important feature: must allow web uploads. I don't want to automate transcoding, or transcode files that are in the server: I want clients to be able to upload their media and get it transcoded.

The transcoding aspect is important: not just a change in container / file extension, but a real transcoding (changing video codec). Being able to change the bitrate is a plus.

I've been looking at many projects and most are sadly either too simple for my needs (only container change, no real ability to choose the codec, or unchangeable bitrate), or focused on files that are already on the server.

(something like a ffmpeg web UI that runs on the server would be great)

Thanks :)

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 5 points 2 days ago (18 children)

I'll ask the question why do you want something hosted, if you don't want the files to be on the server too, or at least accessible via a mount. There's a couple projects who do that for a reason, you can't just upload an 80gb video file through a web interface simply. For home use it makes more sense for it to be connected to some sort of nas and you point it to the file on the nas, and then point where on the nas you want the output file.

As written, I don't think you'll find a lot. I think what may serve you better is finding a server solution that watches a directory and then runs transcodes based on pre defined templates, and spits them back out in a known location.

[–] MajesticElevator@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago (17 children)

Because I want to be able to transcode files from my phone, or from any device without having to install anything.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The problem exists of how do you get files to the server. Again for a big video file you need a place to have the original accessible for the entire duration of the transcode, and you need a drop point to place the file when it's done. And if you're doing that, more than likely you have something like Plex or jellyfin, so why not just hook it up to your existing file locations?

I run jobs all the time from my cluster, but the issue always comes back to persistent storage. Where are the files you need to act on, and where should the finished results be placed? You're trying to skip those important steps here.

[–] MajesticElevator@lemmy.zip 0 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It was meant to run on a server with pretty much nothing on it but yea, if uploading big files isn't possible through a browser, I'll find other solutions. I was hoping files smaller than like 4GB would be fine.

About the storage, I hoped that it would just either load the file in memory, or store during the transcode, then when done, delete the source file and put the transcoded server for a limited amount of time (1h for example), then wipe it (or just wipe it after download)

[–] Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yea, I'd take the approach of having the server monitor a folder, and then just drop files in that folder to be converted.

There are a number of ways to transfer files to that folder, tools like FolderSync (Android), Syncthing or Resilio (every OS) can handle this.

[–] MajesticElevator@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 days ago

Mhh, yea that seems like the obvious workaround, but not the ideal solution

[–] AtariDump@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Possible? Probably.

Practical? Nope!

load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)