this post was submitted on 05 Mar 2026
250 points (98.8% liked)

World News

54464 readers
3458 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] orlyowl@piefed.ca 30 points 13 hours ago (4 children)

This sinking seems like a really big deal to me, but I don't feel like it's been treated that way. Everyone seems to react like it's just another example of Trump being shitty, and it is, but also, we sank another country's warship with a torpedo. That seems pretty momentous no matter what country it was.

[–] Gerudo@lemmy.zip 24 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

And it was unarmed, coming back from an exercise that was essentially a parade. Bonus points of shit!

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip 13 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Apparently the US had pulled out of that exercise at the last minute. So it's the dickest of dick moves.

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Well, I mean, it would have been a little more dickish if we hadn't pulled out and still sank them after… but yeah.

[–] orlyowl@piefed.ca 6 points 11 hours ago

I just learned that five minutes ago, and it really does make it even worse.

[–] SarcasticMan@lemmy.world 22 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

This is only the second warship sunk by a nuke sub (HMS Conqueror) and the first warship the US has sunk with a sub since 1945. We won't talk about the Russian cargo ship that "exploded" in 2024.

In the frame of war, this is big. In the frame of history this is huge. The lack of coverage and the apathy to it is ridiculous. This has never happened in our lifetime, well unless you are 80, so we have that going for us...at least its new lol.

[–] Lumisal@lemmy.world 7 points 8 hours ago

It's the first fully unarmed warship sunk though, so that makes it unique. Also extra unique is that the nation and crew were basically invited first to the parade in part by the USA. So basically it's one for the history books in that is a modern red wedding.

[–] roux2scour@lemy.lol 3 points 9 hours ago

Haha Trump launching tor-pedos

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 5 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Different from smashing their airfields with missiles? Or, is it different because of where it happened?

[–] orlyowl@piefed.ca 8 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

It feels different in a few ways to me. One, it feels much more personal and "fuck you in particular." It's one thing to lob missiles at a base and fuck whoever happens to be there, but you KNOW there's a real possibility that you kill every mother effer on that ship if you hit it with a torpedo.

I'm not articulating it very well, but it's just got a different sort of cruelty that something like shelling an airbase just lacks for me.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 5 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I guess I can sort-of see where you're coming from. Presumably when they're bombing an airbase they're trying to hit planes, destroy runways, etc. If you're in the break room at the time there's a decent chance you don't die. If you're working on a plane, you're probably dead. But, when you sink a ship, everyone goes into the water and there's a good chance they'll die.

To me, the fact that it happened nowhere near Iran is the bigger deal. It means that parts of the world that aren't aligned with either side in the war now have to wonder what might explode in their own territory.

OTOH, at least when you sink a military ship there won't be civilian casualties. If the US had actually declared war on Iran, which of course never happened, but if... then another warship is actually a valid target. This isn't like blowing up an apartment building because a guy on your kill list is in one of the apartments.

[–] orlyowl@piefed.ca 4 points 9 hours ago

Good points, especially this one:

To me, the fact that it happened nowhere near Iran is the bigger deal. It means that parts of the world that aren’t aligned with either side in the war now have to wonder what might explode in their own territory.

I skipped right over that but it's part of it for sure.