this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2026
42 points (100.0% liked)
The Deprogram
1792 readers
98 users here now
"As revolutionaries, we don't have the right to say that we're tired of explaining. We must never stop explaining. We also know that when the people understand, they cannot but follow us. In any case, we, the people, have no enemies when it comes to peoples. Our only enemies are the imperialist regimes and organizations." Thomas Sankara, 1985
International Anti-Capitalist podcast run by an American, a Slav and an Arab.
Rules:
- No capitalist apologia / anti-communism.
- No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
- Be respectful. This is a safe space where all comrades should feel welcome; this includes a warning against uncritical sectarianism.
- No porn or sexually explicit content (even if marked NSFW).
- No right-deviationists (patsocs, nazbols, Strasserists, Duginists, etc).
- Use c/mutual_aid for mutual aid requests.
Resources:
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Forgive my ignorance, I saw this from c/all- what is the deal with the ACP? I'm only starting to understand literally any political theory (never participated in the mentioned sub) and wouldn't call myself a ML but if its not impolite to ask or intrude I'd love to better understand what their deal is and the significance of them taking over a communist space
hi thank u for asking it's nice to see someone curious.
i am not american organizer but so far as i can see for ML/socialist parties in the usa (barring 'demsocs' and DSA, we're focusing on parties hoping to legitimately organize and galvanize revolutionary potential in the country), there are only a few relevant ones nowadays, like CPUSA (communist party of usa [i did know they are also dem entryists, and prolewiki's article is largely negative however ik a few people on here still organize w them and again i cant actually really claim any intimate knowledge]) and PSL (party for socialism and liberation if im not mistaken). ACP has had the most questionable and problematic recent history of these parties and is often called dubiously socialist.
afaik, while ACP does bare minimum of nominal identification as a communist party, and maybe postures towards class consciousness or expresses reasonable anti-capitalist takes, a lot of their conclusions and analyses are frighteningly socially regressive or reactionary.
leadership is often found parroting very anti-lgbtqia takes (the now ex-mod who defended ACP, in question, who insofar as we can tell has no known leadership position in ACP, was seen agreeing with a post on another nominally socialist/'left' subreddit agreeing with the view that transgender people were 'degenerates') and from what i've seen their engagement on actually topical matters of class warfare or struggle is like, close to none.
there are their 'patsoc' takes apart from that. this i know less about, but considering usa is settler colony and decolonization is seen as a primary contradiction + there's not much to be proud about in all of usa history, it's very iffy/chauvinistic.
so, at best this party takes revolutionary potential and redirects it to useless/harmful places like... transgender people. who obviously have more revolutionary potential than the average cis person, because they are already being subjugated by social policies
(also, iirc one leading member haz literally said on twt homeless people are comparable to feudal era landlords, i'm remembering, so maybe it really does indicate complete lack of socialist/ML knowledge or at least evidently capable analysis in their ranks. you have to be coked up to make such conclusions.)
and at best this type of social chauvinism while posturing at 'anti-capitalism' was famous in one german party led by a little toothbrush mustache man... they weren't National Socialists for nothing. so. it ranges from, giving them infinite grace, socialists who are incredibly reactionary and haven't had any substantive wins aside from a symbolic looking invitation to the PRC, to larouchites, to people that could very well be a nazi party if this trajectory continues.
removing all else, there's simply alternatives that have less history of leadership taking such regressive and anti-revolutionary positions, so there's not much reason to attach yourself so deeply, unless that maybe you have takes on lgbtqia that aren't accepted by those other orgs. these groups are also wider. ACP was founded in 2024 (another reason ppl think it's an op, aside from terrible optics and agitprop and divisions they foment within usa left).
i guess if there's no other option, maybe it's okay to join them, if there's a smaller chapter in your area you can look, but even then, a smarter person could probably find arguments that the foundations are somewhat (to entirely) rotted. remember that I AM NOT AMERICAN!!! i have never ever organized there much less with ACP, so if smaller chapters are different or even more distilled National Socialists please comment.
Long story short for the ACP. MAGA with ML word salad.
ya. fascists, capitalists, socdems, MLs, everyone is capable of a cogent and salient criticism of capitalism. the thing is the solution presented. and largely the ACP doesn't even seem preoccupied with finding the actual solution, merely returning Glory days of America before stupid WOKENESS (and also bourgeois to some extent, who gives a fuck, really, focus on the evil TRANS!!! /s if it's not clear). like they're pipelining any revolutionary potential to attack disenfranchised groups, all the while i hear accusations of in this case deeply chauvinistic nationalism among them. strasserite may well be right. larouchite very certainly among haz and the others.
https://en.prolewiki.org/wiki/American_Communist_Party_(current)