this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2026
257 points (99.2% liked)

World News

54580 readers
2556 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 14 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (1 children)

We do know that the US was targeting the Iranian Revolutionary Guards Corp (IRGC), and the school is in an IRGC compound.

The most likely explanation seems to be that they intended to target an IRGC building, but instead hit the school. Whether that's an issue with the missile's guidance system, the plane's targeting system, outdated maps, or a flaw in whatever process the military is using to select targets, is unknown.

It's of course, possible that the US intentionally bombed a little girls school, but it seems somewhat unlikely. Even the most hawkish war mongerers recognize that randomly slaughtering hundreds of school girls is not going to gain support for your war.

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 7 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Came here to say basically this. I read that it used to be on the compound, but that it was separated out by a wall and made into a school some time ago - long enough that it means (if it's true) we were using very outdated data, but you can apparently see on Google maps that it used to be part of the compound but now is outside the compound.

So a charitable interpretation is that we used outdated information to bomb what we thought was a military building. And of course there are less charitable interpretations.

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 4 points 4 hours ago (3 children)

The US has worlds most advanced satellites and intel. It's impossible that they didn't know what they were doing. 100% someone even brought it up and they decided to ignore the person.

[–] masterspace@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 hour ago

I mean, we know for a fact that they used Palantir's system for planning the invasion which is an automated intelligence analysis system.

That alone makes it entirely possible for them to have information and not know about it, on top of all the other existing ways that information can be compartmentalized, or thorough analysis and double checking can be skipped.

[–] daychilde@lemmy.world 10 points 4 hours ago

It’s impossible that they didn’t know what they were doing.

It's absolutely not impossible.

It's irresponsible and stupid, but it's absolutely not impossible. People and systems can be smart, but often they are very very dumb.

That said, I wouldn't be shocked if nobody could be bothered to remove it from a target list under the idea of claiming it was an accident or something.

But do I think it's impossible the people putting it on the target list didn't know? Not at all. (But do I think it was likely there wasn't someone who knew? Also yes)

The military likes to be seen as competent in media but in reality...