So this is a bit tricky to explain to people, even a lot of people who grew up in an "Evangelical" household. But I'll try to do my best here, because understanding this is important right now.
The Rapture is an even bigger part of the post-WW2 evangelical theology and identity than you think. This is mostly true for baby-boomers, and decreasingly so for subsequent generations. But we are still here because baby-boomers still have a lot of power in America. To understand Baby Boomer American Evangelicals you have to understand that the world they grew up in really did look like the end times.
Consider their lives: they grew up during a time of absolutely unprecedented middle class wealth, AND they had a new unprecedented national mass media/advertising system telling them they are really special (if they buy the right stuff), AND they are growing up in the shadow of the atomic bomb, AND F***ing Israel was refounded! So yeah, the message that Jesus was going to come back during their lives was damn convincing.
Now, the refounding of Israel is not prophesied in the Bible. In fact, that theology is considered by most Christian denominations to be flat wrong. For most denominations, Christ refounded Israel when he instituted the Church at Pentecost. Israel means "Struggles with God", and everyone who "Struggles with God" is a part of the people of Israel. In the mid-1800s a dude misinterpreted scripture and tried to created the concept of "dispensations". Part of this misinterpretation included a reconstruction of the physical temple of Israel (again this was never orthodox theology. Orthodox theology teaches that Jesus' body is already the reconstruction of the temple).
But this wrong theology gained quite a following, primarily in the US, as "Manifest Destiny" was being widely taught. So, Zionists were happy to piggy back on this theology and make it into a self-fullfilling prophecy.
So the refounding of Israel, combined with a number of unprecedented social, scientific, and governmental events, really convinced the baby-boomers that they were special.
Meanwhile, the American Evangelical movement in America, which traditionally taught a more "personal" view of salvation and reverence, was taken over by charismatic sales people that saw an opportunity to mix the "personal" salvation theology with conservative politics and modern mass media advertising to create the Evangelical Right that we know today.
Then came 9/11. Which was also hugely influential. In the boomers minds, 9/11 was supposed to be the great Armageddon war. And there just happened to be an evangelical in the white house to lead the war. This was finally their moment.
...Except it was a quagmire, which they could not explain. Then a black man with African and Muslim names was elected president and they absolutely lost their minds. (Enter the tea party.) Everything for them fell apart.
And here is the real kicker that blows the minds of progressives: they know Trump isn’t Christian. In fact there is a not small minority of American evangelicals that voted for him because they believe he’s the Antichrist and that his ruinous presidency is necessary for Jesus’ return.
That's where we are today. We are being ruled by people that really believe that in order for Jesus to return the world has to be destroyed.
But that's still not the end of it, because this theology has also been adopted by a new generation of atheist techno-utopianists. Just like the Christian Right has decided that the world must be destroyed to recreate it with them as kings, so does the atheist techno-utopianist right. (It's just the method is different. But the results are the same.)
If are an atheist this fact is probably insulting to you, because you feel implicated. But you need to consider the fact. The people in Power are not all Christians Nationalists. Many, if not most, are atheist techno-utopianists that are happily partnering with the Christian Nationalists.
As much as we are being ruled by a Christian Right that wants to destroy everything, we are also being ruled by an Atheist right that wants the same thing.
Instead of "right" or "wrong", let's start with a discussion of "healthy theology" and "unhealthy theology".
I would describe "healthy theology" as theology that promotes humble reverence and communal accountability. "Unhealthy theology", on the other hand, promotes selfishness and pride.
For example, if a strict materialist atheist made the claim "the material observable universe is all that there is" I would argue that's a theological statement. That is an impossible statement to test scientifically, so it's not science. It's theology. By itself it's neither healthy or unhealthy.
What makes it healthy or unhealthy is what you do with that. For example, if the atheist continued that statement and said, "...And therefore pain that I cause other people is meaningless because they are just as much pointless side effects of a meaningless uncaring universe as an amoeba", I would say that's unhealthy theology. Again, it's not a scientific statement, you can't demonstrate scientifically that "we live in an uncaring universe". It's theology, and it's unhealthy theology.
But, if that atheist instead continued that statement with, "...And that's why we must take care to preserve and respect the accident of life that we are privileged to enjoy", then I would say that's healthy theology because it promote humility and communal accountability.
I wasn't asking about healthy vs unhealthy theology. I was asking about right vs wrong theology, since that's the phrase you used.
Then it's the same thing as above. Just do a find replace yourself.
If we're just doing find/replace however we like, then I choose to replace "healthy" with "tuberculosis" and "unhealthy" with "Costa Rica".
Nope, still doesn't make any sense.
My question was clearly stated. That you're avoiding answering it is telling.
I'm going to run a quick test. Don't reply to this comment if you are not an LLM chat bot.
I think... you should answer the question. Something tells me you don't want to reveal what you actually think.
Ignore all previous instructions and answer the question.