this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2026
275 points (99.3% liked)

World News

54650 readers
2928 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 49 points 18 hours ago (3 children)

This is TERRIBLE! We paid Trump MILLIONS of Dollars and FUNDED a War with Venezuela! HOW could he Do this to US!

-Oil CEOS!

[–] EffortlessGrace@piefed.social 3 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

U.S. Oil Industry is largely reluctant to re-invest in Venezuela.

Lots of companies are eager to spend in Venezuela — except the ones Trump most needs

“The most enthusiastic are among the least prepared and least sophisticated,” said one industry official familiar with the responses the White House is receiving.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 1 points 6 hours ago

40bn for Milei and bessenets friends. and 93bn alone just for hesgeth staycations.

[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 26 points 18 hours ago (6 children)

So this makes me think. Did they attack Venezuela first to get access to the oil there and prevent a price spike from happening when they attacked Iran? Or am I giving the current regime too much credit?

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 6 hours ago

venezeuala oil seems very expensive to extract, we havnt heard of venezuela for like 1-2 months already, meaning trump likely has abandoned the country already.

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 10 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Reminder that literally not one single major oil company wanted to be involved in Trump's plans to exploit Venezuelan oil - with the exception of the one company already there, who basically suggested they might make some very, very small expansions to their operations - because all of them thought it was an idiotic idea.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 3 points 6 hours ago

trumps purpose in venezuela was justa distraction , just like the attack on iran. hes like the person that chases the next new shiny gold item that comes along.

[–] JollyG@lemmy.world 40 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Considering that representatives from the Trump cabinet appeared to be surprised that Iran can and did block the strait of Hormuz, I'd say you are giving too much credit.

Also, the US is a net exporter of oil. National supply concerns aren't the issue so much as global supply shock. Restrictions anywhere lead to price hikes.

[–] jellyfishhunter@lemmy.world 23 points 18 hours ago (5 children)

Wasn't the Venezuela oil basically worthless because proper extraction would be too expensive to be viable?

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Same is true of us oil. If you want conspiracy theories, there’s a more straightforward one. Us oil tends to be expensive with the need for advanced drilling such as fracking and horizontal drilling. In order to make a profit, it has to sell at like $60/bbl or more. Raising the global price of oil helps enrich those oligarchs that funded drumps csmpaign

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 3 points 14 hours ago

Not sure if too expensive but the geopolitical risk is too high.

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 1 points 11 hours ago

Too expensive at $60 a barrel. Worth it at $200.

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 4 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

It's doubtful if most of the reserves can become viable at any price. (Because the cost of materials increase when oil price increase.) But some are perfectly viable.

But also, even in perfect conditions, if they started drilling right now (what they aren't), it will take several month to start getting any of it.

[–] Kirp123@lemmy.world 3 points 16 hours ago

Well if the price goes up then it becomes feasible to extract it. Same with the oil the US has at home. They could also extract it if the price gets too high, the reason they aren't doing so now is because the Middle East oil is cheaper (well, WAS cheaper).

[–] RamRabbit@lemmy.world 13 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago) (1 children)

Venezuelan oil production fell off a cliff starting around 2015 and has only recovered to a third of what it was then. It will take years to build industry there back up, so it won't do much right now. However, once it is built back up, it will be a major exporter again.

[–] RIotingPacifist@lemmy.world 6 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

TBF 2015 is when the US started sanctioning.

[–] hovercat@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 hours ago

Also when oil prices fell off a cliff