Europe
News and information from Europe 🇪🇺
(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)
Rules (2024-08-30)
- This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
- No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
- Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
- No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
- Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
- If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
- Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
- Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
- No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
- Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.
(This list may get expanded as necessary.)
Posts that link to the following sources will be removed
- on any topic: Al Mayadeen, brusselssignal:eu, citjourno:com, europesays:com, Breitbart, Daily Caller, Fox, GB News, geo-trends:eu, news-pravda:com, OAN, RT, sociable:co, any AI slop sites (when in doubt please look for a credible imprint/about page), change:org (for privacy reasons), archive:is,ph,today (their JS DDoS websites)
- on Middle-East topics: Al Jazeera
- on Hungary: Euronews
Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com
(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)
Ban lengths, etc.
We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.
If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.
If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org
view the rest of the comments
If only ot werent for their anti EU, anti nato (or eu military alliance), and pro russia stance
They don't have a pro-russia stance.
Also, one must distinguish between soft and hard euroscepticism. Being against the fiscal-conservative monstrosity that the EU has become is not the same as being against the idea of Europe per se.
Luckily it has gotten a lot better once moat weirdos left with the formation of the BSW. But yes, the Greens are still better when it comes to foreign policy.
With the openly anti nato and pro russia stance yeah. But its still heavily present. Otherwise they wouldnt vote "no" to sending weapons to ukraine.
Its such a shame Robert Habeck quit politics. Understandable but shame. If he would have come chancellor, i am fully confident, germany and EU would indefenetly be in a better position
AFAIK their stance is to use sanctions first. I agree that there are still too many "pro russia" (or at least "russia-naive") voices in this party, but I think it is an interesting question: why don't we sanction everything that's possible?
The answer is of course money. But it's not (necessarily) a sign of being "pro russia" if you'd rather sacrifice some economical growth than people's lifes.
Plus: their federal chairman Jan van Aken said sanctions would have more impact if they come all at once. Russia's economic system could (somewhat) adjust step by step to the individual sanctions. Harsh sanctions from the beginning might have been a shock to their system from which it could not have (so easily) recovered, That sounds rather plausible to me.
I'm not familiar with their anti EU stand. The recent events have showed us that Nato is a cashcow for the US and also a big lever for the US to blackmail all of the other countries. Furthermore, Mark Rutte is a US puppet and a bootlicker. Concerning Russia, they wanted to work with diplomacy and not by sending weapons for more people to be killed.
Oversimplification, but I get the gist.
(if you search for die Linke and EU, or die Linke and russia you can actually find their official stance on those topics, which is exactly the opposite of what you claimed. Their stance on nato is also more nuanced as they argue for a complete different type of security architecture - no matter how realistic that is).
Do you want me to write out every member of DIE LINKE' opinion on these topics or what do you expect?
And no their stance on nato isnt that nuanced, they advocate for germany to leave NATO, now its less public talking point but still strong notion in the party.
When it comes to russia: they have always been for "negotiations" with russia and against sending weapons to ukraine so they can defend themself from the genocidists. Be it from foolish naivety or active pro russia stance but this position can not be accepted!
Yea, I pretty much expect you to clearly separate between “die Linke” as party with an official program and spokesperson and party members.
Otherwise we will discuss opinions and hearsay instead of official stances, which were criticized.
Edit: and just to be clear, I don’t share their viewpoints.
For me, what a party stands for is represented by their leader and their members.
For example my party: VOLT We arent neo liberal. Not at all, us members hated who the party put out there for germanys federal election. But just like her there is a small loud neo liberal some even AI-Bros group in the party and i hope for all there is, they dont grow. Europe needs an united EU federalist movement with eye on the common people not the rich.
But just like with DIE LINKE or GRÜNE there are the social akwards, the nut cases, and the traitors to the ideals... I only didnt join the left because their ukrane and EU stance...
I hope both VOLT and DIE LINKE sorts those people out and a red green purple alliance in the german parliaments can be forged (or red violet grey aka humanists :) )
Now be fair... they are not only fighting against EU or NATO but also against every other party, organisation and most of the time against that evil traitor sitting right beside them but daring to only 99.9% agree with their ideology.