this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2026
42 points (95.7% liked)

Australia

4899 readers
132 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheHolm@aussie.zone 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This one was a right move. Fuel price is in everything. Keeping it under control is right thing.

[–] SpicyLizards@reddthat.com 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

I strongly disagree as there are alternatives to further torching our world further. This is another short-sighted solution to a problem that inevitably effects us, and we are going all in.

The winners are not us, as much as it may seem

[–] TheHolm@aussie.zone 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What alternatives? Please give an example?

[–] SpicyLizards@reddthat.com 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I doubt you are messaging in any good faith, but which aspect does that open ended question point to? I'm not going to give the history of the world as I know it!

My point is, we have not been good stewards of our environment and we knee jerk towards the most destructive path at all times. Find some evidence to the contrary and we will discuss.

[–] TheHolm@aussie.zone 1 points 16 hours ago

Nothing "knee-jerk" in it; it's just pragmatic. The economy needs to run, and a strong economy is required to achieve any meaningful progress. The main problem is that many of "green" green lack knowledge (or pretend to lack knowledge) of the real world. They do tremendous damage to real "green" projects by advocating for "pipe dreams" instead of projects that could achieve something. Look at the anti-nuclear position of the "Green" party as an example (they should be pro-nuclear if they genuinely care about the environment). All their proposals are just hand-waving, which is unachievable and has no link to reality. And when you ask them, "What are the alternatives? Is there a real plan?" all you get are accusations or another "pipe dream"

[–] Salvo@aussie.zone 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The answer is not for everyone to replace their Gas Guzzlers with Spark Guzzlers. The answer is better Public Infrastructure so humanity can be less dependant on any for if inefficient private transport.

The most efficient Hybrid is still a Diesel Locomotive and the most efficient EV is still an Electric suburban train.

[–] SpicyLizards@reddthat.com 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Didn't say every one gets electric cars. The worst damage will come from mining and industry. We seem to be having different convos.

The dependency issue which we are knee-jerking at, is one created through years of inaction, which clearly won't change.

Ignoring things until they become a problem is not good leadership