this post was submitted on 12 Mar 2026
505 points (99.0% liked)

World News

54943 readers
2935 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Israel did not have a realistic plan for regime change when it attacked Iran, multiple Israeli security sources have said, with expectations that airstrikes could lead to a popular uprising having been driven by “wishful thinking” rather than hard intelligence.

Iran has survived nearly two weeks of bombing raids and the assassination of Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, and Trump is publicly contemplating ending the increasingly costly war.

If Iran’s new leadership keeps its grip on power, the long-term measure of the success of the conflict may hang on the fate of 440kg of enriched uranium which was buried under a mountain by US strikes last June, former and serving Israeli defence and intelligence sources said. Enough for more than 10 nuclear warheads, Iran could use it to hasten the construction of a weapon if the material remains in the country.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (22 children)

Oof that is some pretty shitty reasoning. The US, just with the war on drugs for instance. The peak was over one hundred thousand people dead in 2023 alone. Every single death is preventable, but the US continues to choose to attack the poor and minorities instead of engaging in harm reduction.

Then consider deaths to gun violence. We have lost 1.5 million citizens in the last 30 years. More than every single US soldier lost in every single war we have fought.

Should other nations use this as a pretext to invade the U$ to free its oppressed population?

[–] Gladaed@feddit.org -2 points 1 week ago (16 children)

You know, every case you named isn't slaughtering civilian protestors in the streets, but societal and statistic issues instead of deliberate action?

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (15 children)

These are problems purposely created by the government. The War on Drugs was literally a way to go after minorites. The government defunded research into gun violence.

Trying to normalize this loss of life shows how depraved you are.

[–] renhogan@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Those are serious domestic policy failures and they absolutely deserve criticism. But they’re still not the same thing as a government deliberately carrying out mass violence against civilians or supporting armed groups abroad.

Recognizing that distinction isn’t “normalizing” loss of life, it’s acknowledging that different problems require different responses.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Not the same thing even when the government is purposely doing it like the War on Drugs. Arming police like the military and attacking people in their homes. Clearly we have different ideas of what is mass violence. It is okay for our government to do it, but not theirs.

[–] renhogan@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You need to understand both of these things are bad. they aren't mutually exclusive.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

They are when you are trying to use a moral justification for bombing people.

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (18 replies)