Gladaed

joined 10 months ago
[–] Gladaed@feddit.org 4 points 1 day ago

500m is bigger than you think. Also fines escalate.

[–] Gladaed@feddit.org 0 points 1 week ago

Which is much cheaper than this car. Prices for small cars must go down(and big car prices going way up seems fine, TBf)

[–] Gladaed@feddit.org -1 points 1 week ago

I don't live in car land. Hence I don't commute or shop groceries via car. Charging seems a hassle for typical trips, but I am not an experienced driver. I want mini cars to be cheaper, not go farther, so using one is more sensible.

[–] Gladaed@feddit.org 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I struggle to believe that. Packing more batteries does not mean size has to increase by a lot. the biggest part of car volume is air anyway.

[–] Gladaed@feddit.org 5 points 3 weeks ago

There is substantial resentment on my side against rich oligarchs buying up German real estate and causing the COL crisis we are currently in.

[–] Gladaed@feddit.org 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

"Critical Thinker" Yikes. Somehow the right made that a forbidden word in my mind because they hide behind that as an excuse for asking terrible questions etc.

Anyway. Allegedly the statistics are rather mediocre for self driving cars. But sadly I haven't seen a good statistic about that, either. The issue here is that automatable tasks are lower risk driving situations so having a good statistic is near impossible. E.g. miles driven are heavily skewed when you are only used on highways as a driver. There are no simple numbers that will tell you anything of worth.

That being said the title should be about the mistake that happened without fundamental statements (i.e. self driving is bad because motorcyclists die).

[–] Gladaed@feddit.org 3 points 1 month ago (5 children)

You mental? Homesteading is not plausible for most since it requires a whole lot of money to buy an acceptable property in reach of their job. In particular Europeans. Also funding a business is a risky endeavor.

[–] Gladaed@feddit.org -1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They were under the impression that it was a 3 day bonanza, not a long war because they sipped their own propaganda

[–] Gladaed@feddit.org -1 points 2 months ago (9 children)

Unlikely. There are and where good economic and political reasons for the war.

The blossoming democracy, freedom and wealth in Ukraine are dangerous to the stability of Russia. They show what could have been.

The annexation of crimes did bring ports to further Russia's imperial ambition. The agricultural land is of high quality and will secure Russia's role as a resource exporter after the phase out of fossils. You also need to keep in mind that siberia's agricultural output is severely at risk from climate change. Ukraine had impressive heavy industry. They took transit tolls for Russian gas which could be saved.