this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2026
653 points (99.5% liked)

World News

54755 readers
3081 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

UK and Japan among countries that are considering options but yet to commit warships to blockaded shipping route

Countries including the UK, Japan, China and South Korea have said they are still considering their options but without making commitments after the US president, Donald Trump, urged them to send warships to the strait of Hormuz to secure the vital shipping route.

The effective closure of the strait of Hormuz by Tehran, in retaliation for airstrikes by the US and Israel, has proved catastrophic for global energy and trade flows, causing the largest oil supply disruption in history and soaring global oil prices.

However, the international response to Trump’s call for the dispatch of warships has so far proved vague and reluctant, with countries unwilling to commit to a military response that could prove treacherous for their navies.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 11 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

In Plane interview last night, Trump threatened NATO members to join the war. "We will remember their inaction/US has a long memory" after a year of threats and extortion against all allies. There is no known offer to allies to "be paid" to help. Meanwhile, Israel has authorized, for first time in history, to pay for its own weapons. Trump's threats come with declaring it a victory if oil prices increase for allies, because US oil companies getting richer is "good for America".

Despite "ahead of schedule on plan" claims, this is all obvious defeat. Every other country in the world is much better off getting Iran's permission to cross without military escorts. They need to extort and threaten the US to get them to declare victory and lift sanctions on Iran. Just buy Iran's uranium, and STFU. US would need to pay more to allies for their help than they'd pay Iran to save face.

[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 14 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

The US has a demonstrated very SHORT memory. Who came through for them after 9/11 by landing US bound flights, then fed and sheltered those stranded folks and finally sent their troops to die in Afghanistan?

Only to be ridiculed, tariffed and threatened now.

[–] humanspiral@lemmy.ca 2 points 18 hours ago

oooh, i know this one.... Canada.