this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2026
578 points (98.3% liked)

Not The Onion

20848 readers
2011 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Grumpyleb@lemmus.org 6 points 16 hours ago (2 children)
[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 7 points 16 hours ago (3 children)

That's not even the worst...

Our House of representatives is supposed to make up for it, but each rep represents over 20x the people they did when the country was founded.

The reason we lost so much representation, is the room they occasionally meet in would be too cramped if they kept adding chairs to it.

But just in general, it's almost always best to blame political leaders for a government's actions and not just blame every person living there.

Good and bad.

[–] IronBird@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago)

the cap on House seats was a deliberate move to restrict the power of cities/progressive forces of the time, it wasnt some accident/short-sightedness

make it more expensive to campaign (because you have to reach so many more people) and you effectively force out independent canidates

even if House seats were increased to something sane like 150-200k pop/seat (currently at 800k+, iirc), the senate effectively gives 2/3rds of national political power to 1/3rd of the country. there is no means for the House to completely bypass the Senate

[–] itsworkthatwedo@sh.itjust.works 1 points 13 hours ago

What if those reps had a big, beautiful former ballroom to occupy? That would be pretty cool, someone should get on that.

[–] Grumpyleb@lemmus.org 1 points 16 hours ago

But just in general, it’s almost always best to blame political leaders for a government’s actions and not just blame every person living there.

Good and bad.

Agreed, frustration gets to me, considering I come from the Middle East I tend to have very conflicting emotions, having grown up in England I appreciate law and order, equality and an attitude of live and let live. But when my friends and family are in direct danger, my anger rages.

[–] Sonicdemon86@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

If they do it right they only need 22% of the popular vote to win the presidentance, so yeah don't say it is all Americans that want this when such a small number is needed to win.