this post was submitted on 16 Mar 2026
586 points (98.3% liked)

Not The Onion

20984 readers
2168 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ivanvector@piefed.ca 22 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why not set up a Polymarket bet for how Polymarket is going to handle this? Or whether they face any kind of legal repercussions at all.

[–] NoForwadSlashS@piefed.social 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No joke, this is actually very much how it works. For disputes they use UMA tokens, which allows whales to just buy the vote. Although "being too expensive to corrupt" is the point, there's a bunch of recent news about votes for $50 million markets bought with $7 million worth of coins (which are reusable, once you own them, you can vote on every dispute with the same tokens and voting power).

[–] ivanvector@piefed.ca 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well gee, that doesn't sound like a nightmare of a Ponzi scheme at all

[–] CXORA@aussie.zone -3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It literally doesnt sound like a ponzi scheme at all.

[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They pay for voting power in disputes over betting so that it literally only gives return by new investors - exactly like how any ponzi scheme works

[–] CXORA@aussie.zone 0 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

"Voting power" has nothing to do with the original ponzi scheme. It was all about using the money from new investors to fake high returns on investments for all investors. So a betting market where people aren't assured return at all starts from quite a different proposition, and adding "buying voting power" to it does nothing to increase the similarity.

At a stretch you could compare it to an MLM.

[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Ah yes investing to get money the most not ponzi ever

[–] CXORA@aussie.zone 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If you think "investing" in a ponzi scheme makes you get more mowey out you are the target a ponzi scheme owner dreams of.

[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sooo.. here we are; you flip 180 and forgot that your claim is that there is no investment or scam

[–] CXORA@aussie.zone 1 points 1 day ago

Welp, you just lie. Fantastic.