this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2026
33 points (70.9% liked)

World News

54784 readers
3103 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

On reddit people are discussing the very quick cementing of this new truth, where everything can retroactively be waved off as having been AI.

People talk about the loss of certainty on everything ever since AI became a significant factor.

I disagree, it would be pandemonium if everything needs double checking and nothing is real. I think there is an obvious solution:

Make it into law that any official statement is assumed true unless it's redacted by the subject within a set amount of time.

Make it so people have an appeal window to any news outlet, with heavy consequences for platforms that do not redact.

We cannot be living in psychosis bizzarroland, and if Bibi says he's alive then take the countries word for it.

Let's say someone claims with a video that Trump is dead and replaced by a clone. Why would we allow for people to believe in that kind of nonsense which is obviously meant to divide people and turn a lot of them into crazies. If the administration would claim it's untrue, then that should be published as truth using no uncertain terms: article x was deepfakes

Anyone who claims differently afterwards is perpetuating lies and should be held accountable

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Cort@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

Probably one of musk's, it's not very convincing.