this post was submitted on 17 Mar 2026
86 points (95.7% liked)

Nintendo

24345 readers
91 users here now

A community for everything Nintendo. Games, news, discussions, stories etc.

Rules:

  1. Stay on topic.
  2. No NSFW content.
  3. No hate speech or personal attacks.
  4. No ads / spamming / trolling / self-promotion / low effort posts / memes etc.
  5. No linking to, or sharing information about, hacks, ROMs or any illegal content. And no piracy talk. (Linking to emulators, or general mention / discussion of emulation topics is fine.)
  6. No console wars or PC elitism.
  7. Be a decent human (or a bot, we don't discriminate against bots... except in Point 8).
  8. All bots must have mod permission prior to implementation and must follow instance-wide rules. For lemmy.world bot rules click here
  9. Links to Twitter, X, or any alternative version such as Nitter, Xitter, Xcancel, etc. are no longer allowed. This includes any "connected-but-separate" web services such as pbs. twimg. com. The only exception will be screenshots in the event that the news cannot be sourced elsewhere.

Upcoming First Party Games (NA):

Game | Date


|


Yoshi and the Mysterious Book [S2] | May 21 Rhythm Heaven: Groove | Jun 02 StarFox [S2] | Jun 25 Splatoon Raiders [S2] | Jul 23 Fire Emblem: Fortune's Weave [S2] | 2026 The Duskbloods [S2] | 2026 Pokémon Winds & Waves [S2] | 2027

[S2] means Switch 2 only.

Other Gaming Communities


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The feature, which is buried at the bottom of Nintendo's patch notes, allows for boosted Switch 1 games when playing in handheld, with performance akin to playing with the console docked.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TheOctonaut@piefed.zip 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Dolphin has been around for literally 20 years and Nintendo have never pursued them because they follow the law. More importantly, they are non-profit.

Taking payments to allow people to play leaked first-party titles was a very, very stupid thing to do. 

[–] Ledivin@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They prevented Dolphin from getting on steam (for free) a few years ago, so I certainly wouldn't say "never."

[–] TheOctonaut@piefed.zip 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They didn't 'prevent' anything. Ask Dolphin themselves.

https://dolphin-emu.org/blog/2023/07/20/what-happened-to-dolphin-on-steam/

TL;DR: Valve asked Nintendo of America's layeers if they want it on the store and they said no. No pursuit. No DMCA. No threats. A legal opinion. Valve gave a copy of the response to Dolphin and said if they wanted it on the store they needed an agreement with Nintendo. i.e. instead of benign ignorance from Nintendo, to get a literal "emulate our games" approval from Nintendo. Dolphin wisely decided not to.

In Nintendo's response they mentioned Dolphin includng the Wii encryption key which if you are old like me you will remember being a meme almost 20 years ago (https://gizmodo.com/wii-officially-hacked-338713). Nintendo takes issue with how this was achieved (physically modifying the chips with a tweezers) but again, have never IIRC attempted any legal action to prevent it. So, "no we don't approve" was always going to be the answer. Dolphin appear to have either expected Valve to risk its own position, or to slip under the radar, to distribute its software. In the end, the status quo was maintained: Valve do not publish or distribute (or prevent you installing yourself through Non-Steam-Games) Dolphin, Dolphin did not seek approval from Nintendo, Nintendo does not pursue Dolphin. Except Dolphin got a nice bit of tech news coverage 15 years after its launch and some nerd cred for kinda-not-really taking on Nintendo.

[–] Ledivin@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

They didn't prevent anything, they just said no and then the thing didn't happen because they said no and for literally no other reason. But it wasn't Nintendo's fault!

[–] TheOctonaut@piefed.zip 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Valve were the ones that explicitly told Dolphin that Dolphin would need to supply them (Valve) with evidence of an agreement. Nintendo would not have even been aware of it had Valve not independently reached out to them. Dolphin (wisely, again) did not contact Nintendo. "Prevent" has an actual meaning and it's not "have a negative opinion towards".

I don't know why I'm arguing with you, go argue with the Dolphin devs themselves that they are wrong about their own application.