Technology
Which posts fit here?
Any news that are at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies or tech policy.
Post guidelines
[Opinion] prefix
Opinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.
Rules
1. English only
Title and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original link
Post URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communication
All communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. Inclusivity
Everyone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacks
Any kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangents
Stay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may apply
If something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.
Companion communities
!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip
Icon attribution | Banner attribution
If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.
view the rest of the comments
Honestly, I think the social implications of this are way, way worse than the privacy implications, which are also absolutely terrifying.
Please, can we burn down Silicon Valley, pleaaaase?
I agree. This is feeding off of a new way to market and use people's insecurities, selling them a fix that will do more damage. I think we've already seen this in the business world with adoption of AI for every damn thing, even forcing employees to enbrace it or leave. And the best ones aren't even that good. And then there's Co-pilot, which is worse. So adding another more personal version will pull in more people looking for answers to their problems (caused by a society that's broken).
The question of AGI and whether one can be personal with it is an interesting debate, and not one that people are happy to entertain in discussion or acceptance at this time. But we don't have AGI, may never have it, and this is simply a money grab no different than OnlyFans and webcam girls, only there's no human at the other end that has to get a small part of the profit.
If you dont like how a tool is going to be used, remove the social impetus to use it that way. People dont turn to these chat bots because its fun, they do it because they are lonely. And until that loneliness is dealt with, there will always be solutions like this and society is going to become more fractured and corrupted. While I agree that this is horrific and not a good thing, I also recognise that without tackling the actual issue here discussing the morals of this chat bot is pointless, at best.
Tl;dr if your ability to care begins and ends with "ai bad" without understanding the human cause for why it is being used, then you might as well save your breath.
Yes, for sure, a lot of the problems at hand are caused by the heirarchical structure of society. That's why I'm an anarchist, because in my experience only anarchism has an accurate diagnosis and coherent solution for the problems that plague our society.