this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2026
826 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

82940 readers
2700 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org 43 points 5 hours ago (5 children)

Now if only GrapheneOS was easy to install on cheap Android devices.

[–] kylian0087@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Grapheneos is surprisingly the most easy OS to install... The issue is most phone manufacturer's dont meet Grapheneos its standards.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

I agree, but isn't that just the same way said differently?

it's not hard to install if you have a phone that follows stringent standards, that only 30% of manufacturers follow...

[–] just2look@lemmy.zip 42 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

They have reached a deal with Motorola, so hopefully there will be more options soon. You can get we used pixels pretty cheap though, and the installation process is very easy.

[–] CMDR_Horn@lemmy.world 20 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

I was wondering how this stance will impact that deal. A large company like Motorola would typically seek to comply with laws such as these

[–] just2look@lemmy.zip 18 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

I'm hoping they already had the discussion with Motorola about it. I'm assuming Motorola wouldn't be on the hook legally since Graphene is the OS provider. I could be wrong though.

[–] CorrectAlias@piefed.blahaj.zone 12 points 4 hours ago

Yeah, hopefully worst case, Motorola just doesn't ship them with Graphene (which could be a security risk anyway). Then they'd be off the hook.

[–] Flipper@feddit.org 9 points 4 hours ago

In the worst case it will just be Motorola shipping their base android version with verification and then just flashing grapheme over it. Just the way it currently works with pixels.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 2 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

Remember Motorola phones are made by Lenovo which is now an Indian company.

[–] pipes@sh.itjust.works 10 points 4 hours ago

You mean Chinese? With an ever bigger presence in India I'm sure

[–] Railcar8095@lemmy.world 6 points 4 hours ago

Irrelevant. They need to comply with the laws of the market they are selling at.

Check what pornhub decided to do in Texas

[–] CorrectAlias@piefed.blahaj.zone 14 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

Cheap android devices don't have the proper security hardware. Hopefully the Motorola phone is cheaper than a pixel though. Used pixels are also pretty cheap, all things considered.

[–] Ganbat@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Correction, the oldest supported Pixels that will likely lose support soon are pretty cheap. Everything else was still around $400 when I checked last month.

[–] TheLowestStone@lemmy.world 5 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

$400 is pretty cheap for a phone these days.

No, $400 is about $300 more than any phone could ever be worth.

[–] edgemaster72@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

$400 is more than I have ever paid for a phone (and no, I never bought a carrier locked subsidized phone). From 2014-2022 I had 3 phones that cost a total of $450. This ain't it.

[–] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org -5 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I'm not interested in using anything with DoubleClick's hooks in it. I'm happy with my $30 Tracfone for most of the features it offers.

[–] CorrectAlias@piefed.blahaj.zone 11 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Your TracFone will never have the security features required and will always be vulnerable to things like Cellebrite. If it's an Android phone, you're also being tracked by several companies.

[–] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org -5 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

That's what it is then.I just don't want to deal with the arbitrary nonsense like age-verification and software install limitations. Then again, I only have a phone at all because of my wife. If it were just me, I'd just keep a featurephone in a drawer and maybe check that it's charged once a month. As it stands, I may end up having to give up the small amount of morality I have and just give up on Android and pay a ridiculous amount of money just for phone service.

[–] CorrectAlias@piefed.blahaj.zone 3 points 4 hours ago

I'm glad to see that Graphene won't be doing the age verification thing, because I'm afraid all new phones (including TracFones) will require it moving forward. But the hardware limitations will continue to be a blocker for people with cheap phones.

I agree on wanting to ditch my phone altogether. Maybe if I can retire, I can ditch it.

[–] Blackfeathr@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago (3 children)

And if all banking apps were compatible with it...

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

don't use a banking app if you enjoy your privacy.

there isn't a single banking app that isn't tracking you.

[–] hesh@quokk.au 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Banking apps are generally compatible with GrapheneOS. Some of them just require Google Play Services, which Graphene alone gives you the option to turn on or off at will, or to install only on select user profiles.

[–] CorrectAlias@piefed.blahaj.zone 5 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago)

Banking apps work for me with exploit compatibility mode enabled for them.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 1 points 4 hours ago