this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2026
547 points (98.2% liked)

Not The Onion

20945 readers
1490 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, ableist, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I hope you're being facetious

[–] NihilsineNefas@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No. I literally think Jesus is being reborn in occupied Palestine and his mother is literally repeatedly dying as a result of the ongoing genocide.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well thats a crackpot theory if I ever heard one. Jesus isn't real, and never was. Any apocalyptic preacher who thought they were the son of God just had schizophrenia

[–] NihilsineNefas@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

My brother in christ please learn to read sarcasm.

(If you're on the spectrum as well, then sorry for not being literal with what I was saying, but STILL)

Also not trying to virtue signal here, but that's kinda offensive to schizophrenics, comparing them to religious zealots

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I asked if you were being serious and you said yes. In what world is that considered sarcasm?

[–] NihilsineNefas@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 day ago

Nahh, you're right, I should have dropped a '/s' tone indicator on there, that's on me for assuming the reader can see that I was being intentionally ridiculous

[–] Drusas@fedia.io 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's how someone would likely reply (sarcastically) when speaking in offline conversation.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

Key part there is in person. That stuff doesn't translate over text. Now I know.

[–] youcantreadthis@quokk.au 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

There is no literature. Information is a terrain of struggle, fit only for attacks and tribal virtue signalling. By not already knowing this you have proven you're a fascist or other thing i dislike.

[–] NihilsineNefas@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Some serious nominative determinism in your post because "Jesse what the fuck are you talking about?" Lmao

[–] youcantreadthis@quokk.au 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think we agree on the nominative determinism, but not the reason :(

[–] NihilsineNefas@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 day ago

The reason for me being I cant read (decipher) your post?

I genuinely can't tell what you're trying to say, by "There is no literature" do you mean nobody's written the rulebook for communication through text, or are you saying that nobody's literate any more?

Talking about "Information is a terrain of struggle" doesn't actually SAY anything but it sounds like vague intellectualism

Then the usual thing of suggesting people automatically go "you're a fascist or thing I don't like" in response to a lack of knowledge is not only a bad faith argument but it shows you don't know shit about people.

(None of this is an attack on you personally, I'm just posing what little I can infer from what your comment says, to explain my confusion)