this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2026
516 points (97.8% liked)

World News

55050 readers
2440 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The United Nations General Assembly has voted to recognise the enslavement of Africans during the transatlantic slave trade as "the gravest crime against humanity", a move advocates hope will pave the way for healing and justice.

The resolution - proposed by Ghana - called for this designation, while also urging UN member states to consider apologising for the slave trade and contributing to a reparations fund. It does not mention a specific amount of money.

The proposal was adopted with 123 votes in favour and three against - the United States, Israel and Argentina.

Countries like the UK have long rejected calls to pay reparations, saying today's institutions cannot be held responsible for past wrongs.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] carotte@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

are the descendants of the enslaved people still suffering from it? are the descendants of the enslavers still benefitting from it? yes?

then reparations should be paid.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 6 points 13 hours ago

I think at this point it would be better to focus on providing things like universal healthcare, education, and retirement, to everyone, keeping the cost of living in check, and working on ensuring opportunities for dignified labor and fair compensation are available to everyone, regardless of race or ethnicity.

That alongside rigorous policy measures to reduce (with a mind towards eliminating) things like workplace discrimination, redlining, racial profiling, etc.

There are some examples where the descendants of enslaved people can trace their heritage to their enslaved ancestors, and identify the descendants of their enslavers (often generationally wealthy business tycoons who own factories that pollute the neighborhoods of the enslaved people's descendants...). The people of Africa Town near Mobile, Alabama are a prime example, and there's a pretty good documentary about it.

In those cases, where there is a demonstrable chain of ancestry, yes, civil law should require the descendants of the enslavers to pay reparations to the descendants of the enslaved.

But so many times it happens that everyone wants to paint with a broad brush, where there's no room for nuance, and say things like "all white people should pay reparations to black people." And that's just too clumsy and would never work.

One, because not all white people are generationally wealthy descendants of enslavers, so such a blanket policy of collective punishment meets the definition of racism. Two, because there's no way to quantify in abstract terms how much money "every white person" owes to "every black person."

It's better to focus on making society better as a whole, filling in the gaps where racial disparity still exists (by lifting up the disenfranchised, not by tearing down the privileged), making the wealthy pay their fair share to the government's coffers, making the government ensure robust social safety nets which benefit everyone who needs them, and only demanding reparations in specific cases where there is a direct link between the descendants of enslavers and the descendants of the particular people they enslaved.

[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 6 points 18 hours ago

It's been too long, and who exactly are you going to blame or get reparations taken from? Hell; If memory serves it was other black people who were gathering up and selling the black people into the slave trade. What you gonna do? Give $40 a piece to 50,000,000 black people, along with an I'm sorry card?

[–] encelado748@feddit.org 2 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

How do you determine who is descended of enslaved and enslaver? How do you identify who is benefitting today for something that happened 500 years ago? How do you deal with people that descend from both enslavers and enslaved? There is a long thread about this. Ultimately it is not possible to do what you are asking. Should a farmer in Turkey pay for the benefit the ottoman empire got from slave trade to a white looking mixed american of west african descent? You realize how stupid that sound?

[–] carotte@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

the states would be paying those reparations, not the people individually

european states should pay reparations to the nations they colonized and enslaved, and colonial states (the usa, canada...) should pay reparations to their colonized populations.

[–] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago

the states would be paying those reparations, not the people individually

Where does the state get that money? An eternal mystery

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

And where do 'the states' get their money? Taxes. You'd still be taxing the people to pay for reparations

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 0 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

so? why should they live in the comfort their enslavement created while the majority of third world countries contend with poverty caused by their continued imperialism?

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 0 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Do you realize the immense hypocrisy in your argument? Collectively punish a group of people, who did no wrong, based solely on where they're born because people hundreds of years ago were dicks.

[–] carotte@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 13 hours ago

reparations are a form of wealth redistribution.

do you think taxing billionaires is "collective punishment"? but, oh no, what if some of them inherited that wealth 🥺 it would be so unfair to punish them by taking it away 🥺 all of that for what, the crime of being born into wealth? oh no, those poor, poor billionaires 🥺

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 1 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

do you not realize the immense hypocrisy of yours?

collectively punishing the majority of the world today from consequences of their shit, just so they don't have to take responsibility for it?

it may or may not be their fault as individuals, but the state of colonies and neocolonies is still their responsibility as a country.

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works -4 points 22 hours ago

'If white, then pay reparations' is their answer