this post was submitted on 30 Mar 2026
91 points (100.0% liked)
The Deprogram
1878 readers
55 users here now
"As revolutionaries, we don't have the right to say that we're tired of explaining. We must never stop explaining. We also know that when the people understand, they cannot but follow us. In any case, we, the people, have no enemies when it comes to peoples. Our only enemies are the imperialist regimes and organizations." Thomas Sankara, 1985
International Anti-Capitalist podcast run by an American, a Slav and an Arab.
Rules:
- No capitalist apologia / anti-communism.
- No bigotry - including racism, sexism, ableism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
- Be respectful. This is a safe space where all comrades should feel welcome; this includes a warning against uncritical sectarianism.
- No porn or sexually explicit content (even if marked NSFW).
- No right-deviationists (patsocs, nazbols, Strasserists, Duginists, etc).
- Use c/mutual_aid for mutual aid requests.
Resources:
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
There are a lot of "marxists" that just read Marx, Lenin and other revolutionary leaders just as if they were reading the bible, removing the context, the history, the contradictions of the time, and even the relations between the leaders themselves. So, from this, some traditions are born where people simply worship Trotsky and hate Stalin, or worship Stalin and hate Trotsky, or worship Mao and hate Deng, or worship Hoxha and hate Tito, or worship Marx but hate Lenin, (these would be some anarchists or left coms)... The list is immense, unfortunately.
Real ones don't read any of them and simply parrot what the current trend is, last year I was anti AES, this year im ChinaMaxxing, and tomorrow I'm ordering some ACP merch just in case they take off as I've projected
This way I can never be wrong and laugh at the people who make criticizable posts with everyone else
How about reading them all and using dialectics and historical materialism as a framework to understand the context of their ideas?
Marx and Engels envisioned the revolution would come first from the most advanced countries, and this dominated Marxist thinking in the late 19th century. Lenin broke from this idea comprehending by his study related to imperialism. He saw backwards Russia not as a feudal state but one that already begun in its capitalist development. He understood that capitalism wouldn't develop in the same way in the imperial core and in the periphery and this is a core pillar on Soviet thinking and foreign policy. In Russia, he promoted an alliance between the peasants and workers of Russian urban centers to sponsor the revolution. Mao took a step further and positioned the peasantry as the main revolutionary class in China, due to the agrarian configuration of the country. After the revolution, Mao combined Soviet planning and agrarian communes but failed to industrialize the country, even though it created on the communes and industrial base. Deng integrated China in the international system and adopted liberal reforms to finally industrialize the country, but still maintained CPC power. Other CPC members (which I don't know the names) softened Deng stance on market reforms to avoid the bad effects of a shock therapy and this opened way to a more experimental approach to create the Chinese industry we see today.
So basically every socialist leader acted on the contradictions of the previous ones and dialectically transformed one model into another. Basically different material conditions and different contradictions gave rise to new higher forms. And that is the beauty of dialectics and historical materialism, it does not enforce a static theory, but a dynamic one that is constantly changing.
How about re-reading my reply and using dialectics to understand that no one is actually buying ACP merch?
Poor you. Got downvoted for a joke.