this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2026
355 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

83449 readers
3102 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 51 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

Figures. Patents are the backbone of capitalism. Some say it invented capitalism as we know it.

[–] elvith@feddit.org 32 points 10 hours ago (4 children)

I mean, I get the idea of patents. If there were no protection of "ideas", some random person could have one, try to bring it to market but could just be outplayed by a big corporation with enough money to copy this idea and sell it everywhere before he can even start production. They have more resources and money, but might not have had that idea. There should be some protection. Problem is, that these are also abused by the big corporations, so... Maybe we need to fix this somehow.

[–] Cellari@lemmy.world 1 points 20 minutes ago

It's usually fixed with a good competition. No one corporate can abuse the system if viable competitions exists.

But if I had to give some critique, then the duration for USA patent system is one that can create a money grab system by creating a costly dependency to a legacy system that has grown so long it is hard to replace.

[–] cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de 32 points 10 hours ago

Software algorithms should not be patentable.

[–] knobbysideup@sh.itjust.works 6 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Sure for physical things that need prototypes and materials. That is not a thing with software.

[–] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 hours ago

Development cost is still a thing with software.

[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 7 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

You should be able to own the right to bring a novel idea into production, after it’s generally available then it should have no protection.

Basically if you come up with an idea, you get to get the first initial rounds of profits to make it worth your while, that’s it.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 17 points 9 hours ago

thats a patent

[–] WesternInfidels@feddit.online 8 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Patents are a (relatively speaking) newfangled trick to turn ideas into legal "capital." In the same way that a corporation "is" a person.

The backbone of capitalism? I'm not following that.

[–] ParlimentOfDoom@piefed.zip 1 points 4 hours ago

Patents are a way to spread knowledge, whole still offering some [time limited] protections. Before them, trade secrets were the norm, and way too much knowledge was lost with it's creators.