this post was submitted on 28 Apr 2025
295 points (88.7% liked)

Technology

69449 readers
3399 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I changed the title from "Spying" to "Eavesdropping" because the article actually directly supports that it is "spying" on you, just not listening.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] EmptySlime@lemmy.blahaj.zone 61 points 1 day ago (13 children)

I think I get what it's saying? It's saying that while your phone isn't directly listening to your conversations in any meaningful way they collect crazy amounts of other data on basically everyone and can piece it together in such a way that they can make some scary accurate guesses as to the kind of ads to serve you based on what their systems have gathered your interests are and where/with whom you spend your time.

I'm not entirely sure. They didn't really seem to present much more than speculation on it.

[–] Pheonixdown@lemm.ee 13 points 1 day ago (4 children)

See, people say that ad companies can use all this information they gather to better serve targeted advertising, but that's just not my anecdotal experience.

I get served ads all the time in languages I don't speak, for VERY specific job related audiences that I'm not even close to related to, state politics that I've never lived in, services that I'm already actively subscribed to, just the worst targeting ever.

If I have to get advertised to, I'd so much rather get an ad that could actually be at all relevant to my life, or even some generic ad over the total misses.

Like, if you're going through the trouble to do all this shady shit to get my data at least be good at it using it...

[–] taladar@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 day ago (3 children)

If targeted advertising worked the way they say it does then why is Amazon with my entire purchase history at their disposal, still unable to stop themselves from trying to sell me a second washing machine just after I bought one from them? Or Audible with hundreds of books in my account, most of them English, is still trying to sell me German versions of books with original English language versions? The whole notion that advertising has all that data to do better advertising assumes a competence level that just isn't there.

[–] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Because Amazon just have a shit algorithm. They don't distinguish single purchase items but their algorithm is skewed to try and get you to come back to get the things you got in the past.

[–] Halcyon@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 10 hours ago

One of the goals of that targeting might also be: not to make you buy another washing machine but just to have you click on an ad. That alone brings them ad revenue. And chances are, that people still look at other washing machines even if they just bought one.

[–] joshcodes@programming.dev 8 points 1 day ago

Oooo close. It's a shit algorithm that favours the company that paid the most for the spot. So people rely on paying for a good spot to get promoted on the most minor fucking chance of someone buying their shitty item. I heard someone say the average best item you search for is found 17th place.

They're scamming the buyer and the seller and profiting off of being terrible for everyone.

load more comments (8 replies)