this post was submitted on 05 Apr 2026
83 points (97.7% liked)

World News

55284 readers
1919 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from : https://lemmy.zip/post/62014061

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] mnastroguy@lemmy.zip 7 points 6 hours ago (2 children)

If you think we ‘happened’ to keep a large standing army just because we were defending Europe.

The plain fact is we didn’t even try and reap the peace dividends following the Cold War. We doubled down and found an excuse to pad the pockets of the MIC.

If we’d shrunk down instead of maintaining all this obsolete gear, it’d be easier to be proactive to changes in warfare like drones. We wouldn’t maintain fleets of fourth gen fighters and build out our fifth gen fleets.

You maintain military production capacity by having a strong civil industrial capability.

As we learned in WW2, it doesn’t take much to convert from making cars to making tanks.

Bonus side effect: prevents us from getting embroiled in nation building or getting after commercial wet dreams for regime change when it takes 2-3 years to build up a force.

[–] 8oow3291d@feddit.dk 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

The plain fact is we didn’t even try and reap the peace dividends following the Cold War.

The US did reap a peace dividend. Loads of storied US military supply companies had to close, because there were no longer infinite money for defense.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip -2 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

If you think we ‘happened’ to keep a large standing army just because we were defending Europe.

Where did I ever say that?

[–] mnastroguy@lemmy.zip 6 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

Because, for decades prior, the US was the military of NATO. The US pumped massive percentages of its GDP into maintaining a standing military while most of NATO focused more on social programs with comparatively minimal military spending.

Here ya go buddy. Here’s where you said it.

[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 hours ago

Yes... I said that the US was the military might of NATO. I did not say that was the only reason we have a truly massive military.

If all you are able to do is build tangential strawmen then... do yourself a favor and just go post on chatgpt.